https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/11607

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/11607

The application was allowed because service was demonstrated, the application was unopposed, and prayer 2 had already been granted earlier; the court therefore issued preservatory orders pending appeal, ordered filing and service of the substantive appeal within 30 days, and awarded costs to the applicant.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 11607 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant/applicant: JACQUELINE WAMBUI GIKUBU; 1st Respondent: THE CHAIRPERSON, KAMITI RIDGE RESIDENT ASSOCIATION; 2nd Respondent: THE TREASURER, KAMITI RIDGE RESIDENT ASSOCIATION; 3rd Respondent: THE SECRETARY, KAMITI RIDGE RESIDENT ASSOCIATION; 1st Interested Party: JAMES KAMAU; 2nd Interested Party: FRANSCICA KIHARA
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E070 of 2026
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Notice of Motion for Preservatory Orders Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed in terms of prayer 3; costs awarded to the Appellant/Applicant; further directions given.
Judges
["B Mwamuye"]
Legal Topics
Stay Related Preservatory Orders, Unopposed Application, Service of Process, Interim Protection of Utilities, Appeal Management Directions
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Constitutional Law Landlord Tenant / Resident Association Dispute Stay Related Preservatory Orders Unopposed Application Service of Process Interim Protection of Utilities Appeal Management Directions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

JACQUELINE WAMBUI GIKUBU

Appellant/applicant

THE CHAIRPERSON, KAMITI RIDGE RESIDENT ASSOCIATION

1st Respondent

THE TREASURER, KAMITI RIDGE RESIDENT ASSOCIATION

2nd Respondent

THE SECRETARY, KAMITI RIDGE RESIDENT ASSOCIATION

3rd Respondent

JAMES KAMAU

1st Interested Party

FRANSCICA KIHARA

2nd Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Notice of Motion for Preservatory Orders Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the unopposed Notice of Motion should be allowed
  2. 2 Whether preservatory orders were warranted pending hearing and determination of the appeal
  3. 3 What directions should issue on filing and service of the substantive appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The application was allowed because service was demonstrated, the application was unopposed, and prayer 2 had already been granted earlier; the court therefore issued preservatory orders pending appeal, ordered filing and service of the substantive appeal within 30 days, and awarded costs to the applicant.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in terms of prayer 3; costs awarded to the Appellant/Applicant; further directions given.

Orders

  • Pending hearing and determination of the appeal, the Respondents are restrained from disconnecting, withdrawing or interfering with the Appellant’s essential utilities and services including water and electricity to House No. 5919/545 Kamiti Ridge Estate, and from compelling, coercing or demanding payment of the...
  • The substantive appeal shall be filed and served within thirty (30) days from the date of the ruling, together with a Mention Notice.