[2024] KEHC 8791 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 8791 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's delay of 20 days in filing the appeal was not excessive and was adequately explained by the administrative difficulties in obtaining court proceedings from the small claims court, which is known to be understaffed. The court held that such a delay, under the circumstances, was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 8791 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Thomas Gikunga; Respondent: Madison Insurance Company Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E781 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
Outcome
Leave to file appeal out of time granted; stay of execution denied; each party to bear own costs.
Judges
JN Mulwa
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Execution, Delay in Filing Appeal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Stay of Execution Delay in Filing Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thomas Gikunga

Applicant

Madison Insurance Company Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether there is a decree capable of being stayed to warrant an order for stay of execution.
  3. 3 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was sufficiently explained.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's delay of 20 days in filing the appeal was not excessive and was adequately explained by the administrative difficulties in obtaining court proceedings from the small claims court, which is known to be understaffed. The court held that such a delay, under the circumstances, was excusable. However, the court determined that there was no decree capable of being executed, as the judgment of the subordinate court only awarded costs and did not contain executable orders. Consequently, the court granted leave to file the appeal out of time but declined to grant a stay of execution. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs of the application.

Court Disposition

Leave to file appeal out of time granted; stay of execution denied; each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to file the appeal out of time.
  • The Memorandum of Appeal shall be filed and exchanged within 7 days of this ruling.