[2019] KEELC 2112 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 2112 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had established an arguable case that the minister's decision in Appeal No. 76 of 2019 regarding Land Parcel No. 2022 Kajuki Kamutiria Adjudication Section may have been made without jurisdiction or in breach of the rules of natural justice. The applicant's allegations that he was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 2112 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Gilbert Joseph Kabunjia; Respondent: Land Adjudication and Settlement Officer, Meru South; Respondent: Director of Land Adjudication; Respondent: Chief Land Registrar; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General; Respondent: County Government of Tharaka Nithi
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Judicial Review Case 4 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Leave to Apply for Judicial Review; Ex Parte Hearing
Outcome
Leave to apply for judicial review granted; stay of implementation of minister's decision ordered.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Land Adjudication, Ministerial Decision, Certiorari, Procedural Fairness
Source Language
en
Land and Property Administrative Law Judicial Review Land Adjudication Ministerial Decision Certiorari Procedural Fairness

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gilbert Joseph Kabunjia

Applicant

Land Adjudication and Settlement Officer, Meru South

Respondent

Director of Land Adjudication

Respondent

Chief Land Registrar

Respondent

The Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

County Government of Tharaka Nithi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Leave to Apply for Judicial Review; Ex Parte Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the minister's decision in Appeal No. 76 of 2019 regarding Land Parcel No. 2022 Kajuki Kamutiria Adjudication Section was made without jurisdiction or contrary to law.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant was denied a fair hearing or condemned unheard in the adjudication process.
  3. 3 Whether the minister erred in fact and law in the allocation and adjudication of the disputed land parcel.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had established an arguable case that the minister's decision in Appeal No. 76 of 2019 regarding Land Parcel No. 2022 Kajuki Kamutiria Adjudication Section may have been made without jurisdiction or in breach of the rules of natural justice. The applicant's allegations that he was condemned unheard, that the minister failed to consider relevant evidence, and that the award was not delivered in public or made accessible, raised sufficient grounds for the grant of leave to apply for judicial review. Accordingly, the court certified the application as urgent, granted leave to apply for an order of certiorari, and ordered that the leave operate as a stay of...

Court Disposition

Leave to apply for judicial review granted; stay of implementation of minister's decision ordered.

Orders

  • The application is certified urgent and heard on priority basis.
  • Leave is granted to the applicant to apply for an order of certiorari to quash the minister's decision in Appeal No. 76 of 2019 regarding Land Parcel No. 2022 Kajuki Kamutiria Adjudication Section.