[2019] KEELC 3025 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 3025 (KLR)

The court determined that in the interest of justice and procedural fairness, both parties should be allowed to file further affidavits and written submissions regarding the Preliminary Objection and the application. The court exercised its discretion to grant leave for the 1st respondent to introduce proceedings...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 3025 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Gilbert Joseph Kibunja alias Gilbert Joseph Kibunja alias Gilbert Joseph Kabunja; Respondent: The County Government of Tharaka Nithi; Respondent: Land Adjudication and Settlement Office Meru South Sub County
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 2 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Directions on Preliminary Objection and Affidavits
Outcome
Interlocutory orders granted for filing of further affidavits and written submissions; directions issued for next steps.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Land Adjudication, Preliminary Objection, Affidavit Filing, Ministerial Proceedings
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Adjudication Preliminary Objection Affidavit Filing Ministerial Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gilbert Joseph Kibunja alias Gilbert Joseph Kibunja alias Gilbert Joseph Kabunja

Applicant

The County Government of Tharaka Nithi

Respondent

Land Adjudication and Settlement Office Meru South Sub County

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Directions on Preliminary Objection and Affidavits

  1. 1 Whether the 1st respondent should be granted leave to file a further affidavit to introduce proceedings before the Minister.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to respond to the Preliminary Objection.
  3. 3 Whether parties should be allowed to file and exchange written submissions concurrently.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that in the interest of justice and procedural fairness, both parties should be allowed to file further affidavits and written submissions regarding the Preliminary Objection and the application. The court exercised its discretion to grant leave for the 1st respondent to introduce proceedings before the Minister and for the applicant to respond, with clear timelines for filing and exchange of documents. The directions ensure both parties have equal opportunity to present their cases before substantive hearing.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory orders granted for filing of further affidavits and written submissions; directions issued for next steps.

Orders

  • 1st Respondent granted leave to file and exchange a further affidavit to introduce the proceedings before the Minister within 7 days.
  • Applicant granted leave to file a further affidavit in response to the Preliminary Objection within 7 days.