[2017] KEELC 371 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 371 (KLR)

The court found that the notice to show cause was properly issued to the parties. Neither the plaintiff nor the defendant appeared in court to provide reasons or show cause why the suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. In accordance with Order 17 Rule 2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 371 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Gilbert Joseph Kibunja; Defendant: Julius Mugambi Gacece
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 157 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Land and Property / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
suit dismissed for want of prosecution
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Order 17 Rule 2, Failure to Prosecute, Case Management
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Order 17 Rule 2 Failure to Prosecute Case Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gilbert Joseph Kibunja

Plaintiff

Julius Mugambi Gacece

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution under Order 17 Rule 2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the notice to show cause was properly issued to the parties. Neither the plaintiff nor the defendant appeared in court to provide reasons or show cause why the suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. In accordance with Order 17 Rule 2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court determined that the failure of both parties to take steps to prosecute the matter or to respond to the notice justified dismissal of the suit. The court exercised its discretion to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution, as no sufficient cause was shown to warrant its continuation.

Court Disposition

suit dismissed for want of prosecution

Orders

  • The suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.