[2013] KEHC 2926 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 2926 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiffs were the lawful allottees and joint owners of commercial plot No. 71 at Subukia Trading Centre, as evidenced by the allotment letter and payment of requisite fees to the County Council. The defendant, having been served with summons and other pleadings but failing to enter...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 2926 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Gilbert Kabage Karianjahi; Plaintiff: Daniel Mwai Mureithi; Defendant: James Mwangi Murangu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 20 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment After Formal Proof
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiffs; eviction order granted.
Judges
L Waithaka
Legal Topics
Eviction, Trespass, Allotment Letter, County Council Fees
Source Language
en
Land and Property Eviction Trespass Allotment Letter County Council Fees

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gilbert Kabage Karianjahi

Plaintiff

Daniel Mwai Mureithi

Plaintiff

James Mwangi Murangu

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Judgment After Formal Proof

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs are the lawful allottees and joint owners of commercial plot No. 71 Subukia Trading Centre.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant has trespassed onto the suit land and unlawfully occupied it.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to an order of eviction against the defendant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiffs were the lawful allottees and joint owners of commercial plot No. 71 at Subukia Trading Centre, as evidenced by the allotment letter and payment of requisite fees to the County Council. The defendant, having been served with summons and other pleadings but failing to enter appearance or file a defence, did not contest the plaintiffs' evidence. The court was satisfied that the plaintiffs had proved their case on a balance of probabilities and were entitled to the orders sought, including eviction of the defendant from the suit land.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiffs; eviction order granted.

Orders

  • The defendant to vacate the suit land within 30 days, failing which the defendant be evicted.
  • No order as to costs.