[2018] KEELRC 181 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 181 (KLR)

The court found that the Respondent failed to provide valid reasons or evidence to justify the termination of the Claimants' employment. There was no proof of redundancy as alleged by the Claimants, nor was there evidence of gross misconduct or negligence as claimed by the Respondent. The Labour Officer's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 181 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Gilbert Kiptoo Kipkoech; Claimant: Joseph Orora Aera; Claimant: Ngui Muindi; Claimant: Fred G. Ondiek; Claimant: Peter Kyalo; Claimant: Peter Kipleting Sang; Claimant: John Motari Omosa; Claimant: Kennedy Simiyu Fwamba; Claimant: Lawrence Bosire; Claimant: Gideon Kemboi; Claimant: Haron Monari Tinega; Claimant: Ramadhan Kimutai; Claimant: Thomson Agari Mokaya; Claimant: Duke Ombaki Kirera; Claimant: Dickson Korir; Respondent: Eldoret Grains Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 227 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claim allowed in part
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Redundancy Procedure, Casual Employment, Notice Pay, Annual Leave, Compensation for Termination
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Redundancy Procedure Casual Employment Notice Pay Annual Leave Compensation for Termination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 15
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gilbert Kiptoo Kipkoech

Claimant

Joseph Orora Aera

Claimant

Ngui Muindi

Claimant

Fred G. Ondiek

Claimant

Peter Kyalo

Claimant

Peter Kipleting Sang

Claimant

John Motari Omosa

Claimant

Kennedy Simiyu Fwamba

Claimant

Lawrence Bosire

Claimant

Gideon Kemboi

Claimant

Haron Monari Tinega

Claimant

Ramadhan Kimutai

Claimant

Thomson Agari Mokaya

Claimant

Duke Ombaki Kirera

Claimant

Dickson Korir

Claimant

Eldoret Grains Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the Claimants' employment was unfair and unlawful.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent complied with statutory redundancy procedures under the Employment Act.
  3. 3 Whether the Claimants are entitled to notice pay, accrued leave, compensation, and other terminal benefits.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Respondent failed to provide valid reasons or evidence to justify the termination of the Claimants' employment. There was no proof of redundancy as alleged by the Claimants, nor was there evidence of gross misconduct or negligence as claimed by the Respondent. The Labour Officer's investigation confirmed that the Claimants were not accorded due process, including notice and an opportunity to be heard. The Respondent did not comply with statutory requirements under the Employment Act regarding termination and redundancy. The court endorsed the Labour Officer's recommendations, awarding the Claimants notice pay, accrued annual leave, and compensation for unfair...

Court Disposition

claim allowed in part

Orders

  • Declaration that termination of Claimants' contracts was unfair.
  • Respondent to pay specified sums to each Claimant as notice pay, accrued annual leave, and compensation for unfair termination.