[2019] KEELRC 950 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 950 (KLR)

The court found that the intended appeal was arguable and that failure to grant a stay of execution would render the appeal nugatory, especially given the applicants' concerns about the respondents' ability to refund the decretal sum. The court also determined that the attachment of the applicant's motor vehicle was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 950 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Gilbert Kiptoo Kipkoech; Applicant: Joseph Orora Aera; Applicant: Ngui Muindi; Applicant: Fred G. Ondiek; Applicant: Peter Kyalo; Applicant: Peter Kipleting Sang; Applicant: John Motari Omosa; Applicant: Kennedy Simiyu Fwamba; Applicant: Lawrence Bosire; Applicant: Gideon Kemboi; Applicant: Haron Monari Tinega; Applicant: Ramadhan Kimutai; Applicant: Thomson Agari Mokaya; Applicant: Duke Obaki Kirera; Applicant: Dickson Korir; Respondent: Eldoret Grains Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 227 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Applications for Stay of Execution and Setting Aside Attachment Pending Appeal
Outcome
application for stay of execution granted subject to conditions; application to set aside attachment allowed; costs in the cause
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Security for Judgment, Attachment of Property, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Stay of Execution Security for Judgment Attachment of Property Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gilbert Kiptoo Kipkoech

Applicant

Joseph Orora Aera

Applicant

Ngui Muindi

Applicant

Fred G. Ondiek

Applicant

Peter Kyalo

Applicant

Peter Kipleting Sang

Applicant

John Motari Omosa

Applicant

Kennedy Simiyu Fwamba

Applicant

Lawrence Bosire

Applicant

Gideon Kemboi

Applicant

Haron Monari Tinega

Applicant

Ramadhan Kimutai

Applicant

Thomson Agari Mokaya

Applicant

Duke Obaki Kirera

Applicant

Dickson Korir

Applicant

Eldoret Grains Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Applications for Stay of Execution and Setting Aside Attachment Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to stay of execution of the judgment pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the attachment and intended sale of the applicant's motor vehicle was lawful.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent should bear auctioneer's charges for the attachment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the intended appeal was arguable and that failure to grant a stay of execution would render the appeal nugatory, especially given the applicants' concerns about the respondents' ability to refund the decretal sum. The court also determined that the attachment of the applicant's motor vehicle was irregular as it was conducted before the expiry of the statutory notice period and without proper service of proclamation. Consequently, the court granted a stay of execution on condition that the entire decretal sum be deposited in court within ten days, ordered the release of the attached vehicle to the applicant, and directed the respondent to bear the auctioneer's charges...

Court Disposition

application for stay of execution granted subject to conditions; application to set aside attachment allowed; costs in the cause

Orders

  • Stay of execution pending appeal is granted subject to deposit of the entire decretal sum in court within 10 days, failing which stay lapses and execution to follow.
  • The claimant/respondent to release to the applicant the motor vehicle registration number KAT 456U together with goods therein forthwith and without any condition precedent.