[2017] KEELC 2664 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 2664 (KLR)

The court allowed the withdrawal of the appeal on the basis that both parties were represented and there was no objection from the respondent. The court found that no written notice was necessary under Order 25 Rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, given the circumstances. The court also considered the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 2664 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Gilbert O. Anyona; Respondent: Stephen M. Marita
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kisii
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Appeal 160 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Withdrawal of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Appeal, Costs Orders, Delay of Justice, Civil Procedure Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Withdrawal of Appeal Costs Orders Delay of Justice Civil Procedure Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gilbert O. Anyona

Appellant

Stephen M. Marita

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Withdrawal of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant should be allowed to withdraw the appeal without an order as to costs.
  2. 2 Whether written notice is required for withdrawal when both parties are represented.
  3. 3 Whether the delay in prosecution of the appeal affects the withdrawal application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court allowed the withdrawal of the appeal on the basis that both parties were represented and there was no objection from the respondent. The court found that no written notice was necessary under Order 25 Rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, given the circumstances. The court also considered the delay in the matter, referencing Article 159(2)(b) of the Constitution, which mandates that justice shall not be delayed. On the issue of costs, the court exercised its discretion under Section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act and, considering the nature of the application and the lack of opposition, made no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

Appeal withdrawn with no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The application for withdrawal of the appeal is allowed.
  • No order as to costs.