[2012] KEHC 813 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 813 (KLR)

The court held that since there was a subsisting order staying proceedings in the suit, issued on 3rd March, 2005, it was not open to the plaintiff to bring the present application for deposit of mesne profits. The stay order applied to all proceedings in the matter, including interlocutory applications such as the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEHC 813 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Giro Commercial Bank; Defendant: Macho Credit Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 603 of 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application struck out. Each party to bear its own costs.
Judges
CM Njagi, GV Odunga
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Mesne Profits, Preliminary Objection
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Proceedings Mesne Profits Preliminary Objection

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Giro Commercial Bank

Plaintiff

Macho Credit Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the court can entertain the plaintiff's application for deposit of mesne profits in light of an existing stay of proceedings order.
  2. 2 Whether the stay of proceedings order issued on 3rd March, 2005 precludes the current application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since there was a subsisting order staying proceedings in the suit, issued on 3rd March, 2005, it was not open to the plaintiff to bring the present application for deposit of mesne profits. The stay order applied to all proceedings in the matter, including interlocutory applications such as the one before the court. The court emphasized that it could not interfere with its own order unless the stay was formally set aside. Consequently, the application was not well founded and was struck out.

Court Disposition

Application struck out. Each party to bear its own costs.

Orders

  • The plaintiff's application dated 13th July, 2010 is struck out.
  • Each party to bear its own costs.