[2023] KEELC 18265 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 18265 (KLR)

The court found that both applications were filed at the last minute, despite the parties having ample notice of the scheduled site visit and the issues at hand. The judge emphasized that such applications should be made promptly to avoid disrupting court proceedings and inconveniencing parties who had already made...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 18265 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Nyambega Gisesa; Respondent: National Land Commission; Respondent: Attorney General; Interested Party: County Government of Nyamira; Interested Party: County Government of Kisii; Interested Party: Ministry of Lands And Physical Planning
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Petition E001 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications
Outcome
Applications for stay of proceedings, referral to mediation, and recusal of judge declined at this stage; applications to be served and heard on a later date.
Judges
JM Kamau
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Applications, Stay of Proceedings, Recusal of Judge, Mediation Referral
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Interlocutory Applications Stay of Proceedings Recusal of Judge Mediation Referral

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nyambega Gisesa

Applicant

National Land Commission

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

County Government of Nyamira

Interested Party

County Government of Kisii

Interested Party

Ministry of Lands And Physical Planning

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications

  1. 1 Whether the applications for stay of proceedings and referral to mediation should be granted at this stage.
  2. 2 Whether the application for recusal of the presiding judge is merited given the timing and grounds advanced.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that both applications were filed at the last minute, despite the parties having ample notice of the scheduled site visit and the issues at hand. The judge emphasized that such applications should be made promptly to avoid disrupting court proceedings and inconveniencing parties who had already made preparations. The court declined to grant an immediate stay or referral to mediation, instead ordering that both applications be served on all parties and set down for hearing on a later date. The exercise of identifying the boundary at the locus in quo was allowed to proceed as scheduled, as stopping it at the last minute would be unfair to the parties already present.

Court Disposition

Applications for stay of proceedings, referral to mediation, and recusal of judge declined at this stage; applications to be served and heard on a later date.

Orders

  • Application dated June 15, 2023 to be served on all parties for hearing on July 4, 2023.
  • Application dated June 14, 2023 to be served on all parties for hearing on July 4, 2023.