[2024] KEHC 9026 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 9026 (KLR)

The court found that the application for stay of execution was filed without unreasonable delay following the delivery of judgment and the filing of the appeal. The court held that the applicant would suffer substantial loss if the decretal sum is paid out and the appeal subsequently succeeds, as recovery from the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 9026 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Benard Muchene Gitau; Respondent: Zilipa Malemba Sawarini
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Voi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Judgment Date
4 July 2024
Case Number
Civil Appeal E022 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application for stay of execution allowed with conditions.
Judges
GMA Dulu
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Security for Decree, Appeal From Money Decree
Source Language
english
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Security for Decree Appeal From Money Decree

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benard Muchene Gitau

Applicant

Zilipa Malemba Sawarini

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment/decree pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the application for stay was filed without unreasonable delay.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant will suffer substantial loss if stay is not granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for stay of execution was filed without unreasonable delay following the delivery of judgment and the filing of the appeal. The court held that the applicant would suffer substantial loss if the decretal sum is paid out and the appeal subsequently succeeds, as recovery from the respondent may not be guaranteed. The court determined that stay of execution is justified but should be conditional upon the applicant paying part of the decretal amount (Kshs. 80,000) to the respondent as adequate security, rather than a bank guarantee. Failure to comply with this condition within 45 days would result in the lapse of the stay orders. Costs of the application...

Court Disposition

Application for stay of execution allowed with conditions.

Orders

  • Stay of execution of judgment or decree granted pending determination of appeal.
  • Stay is subject to applicant paying respondent Kshs. 80,000 through counsel within 45 days from the date of ruling.