[2018] KEHC 2822 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 2822 (KLR)

The High Court found that, pursuant to Article 162(2) of the Constitution and the Environment and Land Court Act, it lacks jurisdiction to address and determine the present matter, which concerns land and environment issues. The court held that the proper forum for the determination of such matters is the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 2822 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Gitere Kahura Investments Ltd; Defendant: Samuel Mundti Gatabaki; Defendant: Nancy Wanja Gatabaki
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 2752 of 1982
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Preliminary Objection Ruling
Outcome
Transferred to Environment and Land Court for directions; High Court declined jurisdiction.
Judges
A Mbogholi-Msagha
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Transfer of Suit, Environment and Land Court, Constitutional Mandate
Source Language
en
Land and Property Jurisdiction Transfer of Suit Environment and Land Court Constitutional Mandate

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gitere Kahura Investments Ltd

Plaintiff

Samuel Mundti Gatabaki

Defendant

Nancy Wanja Gatabaki

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Preliminary Objection Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to determine the matter in light of Article 162(2) of the Constitution and the Environment and Land Court Act.
  2. 2 Whether the matter should be transferred to the Environment and Land Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court found that, pursuant to Article 162(2) of the Constitution and the Environment and Land Court Act, it lacks jurisdiction to address and determine the present matter, which concerns land and environment issues. The court held that the proper forum for the determination of such matters is the Environment and Land Court. Consequently, the High Court declined to exercise jurisdiction and directed that the file be placed before the Presiding Judge of the Environment and Land Court for appropriate directions regarding the hearing of the application.

Court Disposition

Transferred to Environment and Land Court for directions; High Court declined jurisdiction.

Orders

  • The file shall be placed before the Presiding Judge of the Environment and Land Court on 5th November, 2018 for appropriate directions.
  • Counsel on record are informed of the transfer and priority status of the matter.