[2021] KEHC 8137 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 8137 (KLR)

The court held that since the certificate of taxation issued in favour of the applicant had not been set aside or altered by any reference or review, it was conclusive as to the amount due. The respondent's opposition lacked any legal or factual basis, and the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed costs,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 8137 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Githinji Kimamo & Co. Advocates; Respondent: Endmor Steel Millers Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 86 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs, interest, and costs of the application
Judges
A Mbogholi-Msagha
Legal Topics
Advocate Client Bill of Costs, Taxation of Costs, Certificate of Taxation, Enforcement of Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Advocate Client Bill of Costs Taxation of Costs Certificate of Taxation Enforcement of Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Githinji Kimamo & Co. Advocates

Applicant

Endmor Steel Millers Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment on the basis of a certificate of taxation that has not been set aside or altered.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has any valid legal or factual ground to resist the entry of judgment for the taxed costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the certificate of taxation issued in favour of the applicant had not been set aside or altered by any reference or review, it was conclusive as to the amount due. The respondent's opposition lacked any legal or factual basis, and the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed costs, together with interest from the date of taxation. The application for judgment was therefore allowed as drawn.

Court Disposition

application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs, interest, and costs of the application

Orders

  • Judgment is entered in favour of the applicant against the respondent for Kshs. 32,340 as per the certificate of taxation dated 28th August, 2019.
  • The applicant is entitled to interest on the taxed costs from the date of taxation.