[2020] KEELC 2853 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 2853 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to comply with its directions to serve the memorandum of appeal, accompanying documents, and the court's ruling upon the respondent within the stipulated period. There was no evidence of service or any effort to notify the respondent of the hearing dates. The applicant's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 2853 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Gitonga Nyaga Boore; Respondent: Nyaga Boore Kanyoro
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 12 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Service of Process, Land Inhibition Orders, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Interlocutory Injunctions Service of Process Land Inhibition Orders Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gitonga Nyaga Boore

Appellant

Nyaga Boore Kanyoro

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to orders of inhibition against dealings in the suit land pending determination of the intended suit.
  2. 2 Whether the lower court's ex-parte orders should be vacated and the caution reinstated.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant has diligently prosecuted the application and complied with court directions regarding service.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to comply with its directions to serve the memorandum of appeal, accompanying documents, and the court's ruling upon the respondent within the stipulated period. There was no evidence of service or any effort to notify the respondent of the hearing dates. The applicant's lack of diligence in prosecuting the application and failure to comply with mandatory procedural requirements led the court to conclude that the application could not be sustained. Consequently, the application dated 28th February, 2020 was dismissed for want of prosecution and non-compliance with court orders.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 28th February, 2020 is hereby dismissed.
  • No order as to costs is issued.