[2024] KEHC 473 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had satisfied the requirements for stay of execution under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The applicant demonstrated willingness to provide security by depositing the decretal sum in a joint interest earning account and raised arguable issues in the memorandum of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 473 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: John Gitungene Gituku; Respondent: Abdi Dore Farah
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kajiado
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2024
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal E090 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed.
- Judges
- SN Mutuku
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appeal Procedure, Security for Decree
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Gitungene Gituku
Appellant
Abdi Dore Farah
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the decree pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicant has satisfied the requirements for grant of stay under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
- 3 Whether security for due performance of the decree has been adequately offered.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had satisfied the requirements for stay of execution under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The applicant demonstrated willingness to provide security by depositing the decretal sum in a joint interest earning account and raised arguable issues in the memorandum of appeal. The respondent did not file a substantive response opposing the application, only submissions. The court was persuaded that, in the absence of opposition and given the applicant's readiness to secure the decree, a stay of execution was warranted to preserve the subject matter of the appeal and prevent the appeal from being rendered nugatory.
Court Disposition
Application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed.
Orders
- Stay of execution of the judgment and decree in CMCC No. 214 of 2014 granted pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
- Applicant to deposit the decretal sum in a joint interest earning account in the names of the current advocates for the parties within 30 days from the date of the ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment