[2022] KEHC 10365 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 10365 (KLR)

The court held that the dispute, as pleaded, is a commercial/corporate dispute concerning shareholder rights and company management, not a matrimonial property claim. The plaintiff, as a shareholder, may bring a derivative action for wrongs done to the company, but such an action requires leave of court under the Companies Act. The absence of leave does not render the suit fatally defective, but the application for interim relief is premature and cannot be entertained until leave is sought and obtained. The court therefore struck out the application for interim orders, with no order as to costs, and directed the parties to take steps to regularize the proceedings by seeking leave if so...

Citation
[2022] KEHC 10365 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Damaris Kagwiria Gituma; Defendant: Erastus Gituma; Defendant: Scolars Plaza Co. Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Judgment Date
25 May 2022
Case Number
Civil Case 023 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Related Interim Reliefs
Outcome
Application struck out as premature for want of leave to proceed with derivative action.
Judges
PJO Otieno
Legal Topics
Derivative Actions, Shareholder Rights, Company Management Disputes, Interlocutory Injunctions
Source Language
English
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Derivative Actions Shareholder Rights Company Management Disputes Interlocutory Injunctions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Damaris Kagwiria Gituma

Plaintiff

Erastus Gituma

Defendant

Scolars Plaza Co. Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Related Interim Reliefs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff has locus standi to bring a derivative action on behalf of the company without prior leave of court.
  2. 2 Whether the application for interim injunction and related orders is maintainable in the absence of leave to proceed with a derivative action.
  3. 3 Whether the dispute is properly characterized as a commercial/corporate dispute or a matrimonial property dispute.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the dispute, as pleaded, is a commercial/corporate dispute concerning shareholder rights and company management, not a matrimonial property claim. The plaintiff, as a shareholder, may bring a derivative action for wrongs done to the company, but such an action requires leave of court under the Companies Act. The absence of leave does not render the suit fatally defective, but the application for interim relief is premature and cannot be entertained until leave is sought and obtained. The court therefore struck out the application for interim orders, with no order as to costs, and directed the parties to take steps to regularize the proceedings by seeking leave if so...

Court Disposition

Application struck out as premature for want of leave to proceed with derivative action.

Orders

  • The plaintiff's application dated August 31, 2021 is struck out for being premature.
  • No order as to costs.