[2024] KEHC 6405 (KLR)
The court found that directions in the appeal had already been given on 12th July, 2023, and that the memorandum of appeal as filed specifically challenges the ruling delivered on 14th June, 2023. The appellant's attempt to amend the memorandum to include orders relating to a judgment not originally appealed against...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 6405 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: George Mugambi Gituma; Respondent: Mutwiri Jacob Lintari; Respondent: Faith Ntarara Muketha
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal E099 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Amend Memorandum of Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the respondents
- Judges
- TW Cherere
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Memorandum of Appeal, Court Discretion, Abuse of Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Mugambi Gituma
Appellant
Mutwiri Jacob Lintari
Respondent
Faith Ntarara Muketha
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Amend Memorandum of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant should be granted leave to amend the memorandum of appeal to include additional orders sought.
- 2 Whether the proposed amendment amounts to an abuse of the court process by attempting to introduce an appeal against a judgment not originally challenged.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that directions in the appeal had already been given on 12th July, 2023, and that the memorandum of appeal as filed specifically challenges the ruling delivered on 14th June, 2023. The appellant's attempt to amend the memorandum to include orders relating to a judgment not originally appealed against was deemed to be an improper expansion of the scope of the appeal and an abuse of the court process. The court held that the orders to be issued at the conclusion of the appeal will arise from the memorandum of appeal and the parties' arguments, and there is no need for the appellant to specify additional orders at this stage. Consequently, the application to amend the...
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the respondents
Orders
- The notice of motion dated 23rd April, 2024 is disallowed with costs to the respondent.
- Mention before the Deputy Registrar on 11th July, 2024 to confirm availability of the lower court file.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
Gituma v Lintari & another (Civil Appeal E099 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 6405 (KLR) (30 May 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 6405 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Meru
Civil Appeal E099 of 2023
TW Cherere, J
May 30, 2024
Between
George Mugambi Gituma
Appellant
and
Mutwiri Jacob Lintari
1st Respondent
Faith Ntarara Muketha
2nd Respondent
Ruling
1. By notice of motion dated 23rd April, 2024, supported by an affidavit sworn by George Mugambi Gituma (Appellant/Applicant) on even date, Applicant seeks leave to amend the memorandum of appeal to include two specific orders that he wishes to seek from the court.
2. Respondents opposed the application by way of a replying affidavit sworn by Mutwiri Jacob Lintari (1st Respondent) on 09th May, 2024 in which he avers that the Applicant intends to sneak an appeal of the judgment dated 23rd February, 2022 yet the appeal as filed is against the ruling dated 14th June, 2023.
3. I have considered the application in the light of the affidavits on record and annexures thereto.
4. This court’s power to amend the memorandum of appeal is provided for under Order 42 of the Civil Procedure Rules which provides as follows:[Order 42, rule 3. ] Amendment of memorandum of appeal.3. (1)The appellant may amend his memorandum of appeal without leave at any time before the court gives directions under rule 13. (2)After the time limited by subrule (1) the court may, on application, permit the appellant to amend his memorandum of appeal.
5. Direction in this matter were given on 12th July, 2023 but the trial court file is yet to be availed.
6. The memorandum of appeal dated 26th June, 2023 and filed on 29th June, 2023 clearly challenges the ruling of the trial court delivered on 14th June, 2023.
7. The appeal is based on grounds that Appellant was denied an opportunity to present his defence.
8. The orders that the court will finally issue after considering the appeal will certainly arise from the memorandum of appeal and the arguments of the parties. The court does therefore not require any direction on the specific orders it ought to grant in the circumstances of this appeal.
9. Additionally, the appeal relates to a specific ruling delivered on 14th June, 2023 and any attempt to include as part of the appeal any undisclosed judgments is not only mischievous but is an abuse of the court process.
10. From the foregoing, it is hereby ordered:1. The notice of motion dated 23rd April, 2024 is without merit and it is disallowed with costs the Respondent.2. Mention before the Deputy Registrar on 11th July, 2024 to confirm availability of the lower court file
DELIVERED IN MERU THIS 30TH DAY OF May 2024WAMAE.T. CHEREREJUDGEAppearancesCourt Assistants - Kinoti/MuneneFor Appellant/Applicant – N/A for Kiogora Mugambi & Co. AdvocatesFor Respondents - Mr. Ochako for J.Okerosi Ochako & Co Advocates