[2018] KEHC 9614 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 9614 (KLR)

The court held that the Law of Succession Act and the Constitution require equal distribution of an intestate estate among all surviving children, without discrimination based on gender or marital status. The protestor's argument for a larger share due to being the only male child and his siblings being married...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 9614 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Gladys Kainda Mbae; Respondent: Francis Kithinji Nkanata
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 57 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Protest dismissed; grant confirmed; estate to be distributed equally among surviving children.
Judges
BB Limo
Legal Topics
Intestate Succession, Equal Distribution of Estate, Discrimination in Inheritance, Confirmation of Grant, Administration of Estates
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Intestate Succession Equal Distribution of Estate Discrimination in Inheritance Confirmation of Grant Administration of Estates

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gladys Kainda Mbae

Applicant

Francis Kithinji Nkanata

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the estate of the deceased should be distributed equally among all surviving children regardless of gender or marital status.
  2. 2 Whether the protestor is entitled to a larger share of the estate on account of being the only male child and having developed part of the property.
  3. 3 Whether the proposals for distribution by the petitioner or protestor should be adopted by the court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the Law of Succession Act and the Constitution require equal distribution of an intestate estate among all surviving children, without discrimination based on gender or marital status. The protestor's argument for a larger share due to being the only male child and his siblings being married daughters was found to be discriminatory and contrary to both statutory and constitutional law. The court confirmed the grant issued to the administratrix and ordered that all properties comprising the estate be equally divided among the five surviving children of the deceased. The court further directed that the Deputy Registrar execute requisite documents on behalf of any party...

Court Disposition

Protest dismissed; grant confirmed; estate to be distributed equally among surviving children.

Orders

  • The grant issued to the administratrix on 17th June 2014 is confirmed.
  • All properties comprising the estate shall be equally divided among the five named children of the deceased.