[2017] KEHC 6399 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 6399 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated reasonable apprehension of bias at Keroka Law Courts, given the disqualification of the Principal Magistrate and prior involvement of another magistrate in a related criminal matter involving the applicant. The court held that, in the interest of justice and to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 6399 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Gladys Kemunto Aunga; Defendant: Charles Otaro Moseti; Defendant: County Government of Nyamira
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Case 15 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Suit
Outcome
Application allowed. Case transferred to Kisii Law Courts.
Judges
CB Nagillah
Legal Topics
Transfer of Suit, Jurisdiction, Impartiality of Court
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Transfer of Suit Jurisdiction Impartiality of Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gladys Kemunto Aunga

Plaintiff

Charles Otaro Moseti

Defendant

County Government of Nyamira

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Suit

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be transferred from Keroka Law Courts to Kisii Law Courts for hearing and determination.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is likely to suffer prejudice if the matter remains at Keroka Law Courts.
  3. 3 Whether the interest of justice requires the transfer of the case.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated reasonable apprehension of bias at Keroka Law Courts, given the disqualification of the Principal Magistrate and prior involvement of another magistrate in a related criminal matter involving the applicant. The court held that, in the interest of justice and to ensure impartiality, the suit should be transferred to Kisii Law Courts for hearing and determination. The court emphasized that the administration of justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done, and that the applicant's concerns about partiality were sufficient to warrant the transfer.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Case transferred to Kisii Law Courts.

Orders

  • Keroka PMCC No. 223 of 2015 is transferred to Kisii Law Courts for hearing and determination.
  • The case shall be mentioned on 25th April, 2017 in the Chief Magistrate’s Court Kisii to fix a hearing date.