[2020] KECA 597 (KLR)

[2020] KECA 597 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's explanation for the delay was plausible, as the date for delivery of judgment was changed twice and only communicated through cause lists, with no evidence of direct service to the parties. The applicant acted promptly upon learning of the judgment by filing the notice of appeal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KECA 597 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Glory Auto Services Limited; Respondent: Formax Insurance Brokers Limited
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 241 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Judicial Discretion, Service of Judgment, Appeal Rights
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Notice of Appeal Judicial Discretion Service of Judgment Appeal Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Glory Auto Services Limited

Applicant

Formax Insurance Brokers Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided a sufficient explanation for the delay in filing the notice of appeal and record of appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to extend time for filing the notice and record of appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant's intended appeal is arguable.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's explanation for the delay was plausible, as the date for delivery of judgment was changed twice and only communicated through cause lists, with no evidence of direct service to the parties. The applicant acted promptly upon learning of the judgment by filing the notice of appeal and the application for extension without undue delay. The draft memorandum of appeal disclosed arguable grounds. In the interests of justice and the right to be heard on merit, the court exercised its discretion to extend time for filing the notice and record of appeal, deeming the notice of appeal filed on 22nd July, 2019 as properly filed within time. Costs of the...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Time for filing the appeal is extended.
  • The notice of appeal lodged on 22nd July, 2019 is deemed filed within time.