[2020] KECA 597 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's explanation for the delay was plausible, as the date for delivery of judgment was changed twice and only communicated through cause lists, with no evidence of direct service to the parties. The applicant acted promptly upon learning of the judgment by filing the notice of appeal...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KECA 597 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Glory Auto Services Limited; Respondent: Formax Insurance Brokers Limited
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 241 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Judicial Discretion, Service of Judgment, Appeal Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Glory Auto Services Limited
Applicant
Formax Insurance Brokers Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has provided a sufficient explanation for the delay in filing the notice of appeal and record of appeal.
- 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to extend time for filing the notice and record of appeal.
- 3 Whether the applicant's intended appeal is arguable.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's explanation for the delay was plausible, as the date for delivery of judgment was changed twice and only communicated through cause lists, with no evidence of direct service to the parties. The applicant acted promptly upon learning of the judgment by filing the notice of appeal and the application for extension without undue delay. The draft memorandum of appeal disclosed arguable grounds. In the interests of justice and the right to be heard on merit, the court exercised its discretion to extend time for filing the notice and record of appeal, deeming the notice of appeal filed on 22nd July, 2019 as properly filed within time. Costs of the...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Time for filing the appeal is extended.
- The notice of appeal lodged on 22nd July, 2019 is deemed filed within time.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAIROBI
(CORAM: OKWENGU JA (IN CHAMBERS)
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 241 OF 2019 (UR 220/2019)
BETWEEN
GLORY AUTO SERVICES LIMITED..............................APPLICANT
AND
FORMAX INSURANCE BROKERS LIMITED..................RESPONDENT
(Being an application for extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal and record of appeal against the Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (J. K. Sergon, J.) delivered on 2ndMay, 2019
in
H.C.C.A. No. 91 of 2017)
**********************
RULING
[1] By a notice of motion dated and filed on 26th July, 2019 the applicant herein, Glory Auto Services Limited seeks to have time extended to enable it lodge a notice of appeal and record of appeal against the judgment of the High Court (Sergon, J) delivered on 2nd May, 2019 in Nairobi HCCA No. 91 of 2017. The applicant also seeks to have a notice of appeal that it had lodged on 22nd July, 2019 deemed to have been filed within time.
[2] The application is anchored on grounds stated on the motion and a supporting affidavit sworn by Johnson Matara, who is the applicant’s administration manager. In short the applicant contends that they were not aware of the delivery of the judgment and only came to know of it on 16th July, 2019, when they were served with a decree by the respondent’s advocates, by which time, the time within which it should have filed a notice of appeal had elapsed. The applicant maintains that the failure to file the notice of appeal in time was not intentional. It maintains that it has an arguable appeal that has high chances of success. A copy of the draft memorandum of appeal has been duly annexed.
[3] The application is opposed through a replying affidavit sworn by Titus Nzuki Wambua(Wambua), who is a technical manager of the respondent’s company, Formax Insurance Brokers Limited. Wambua swears that the learned Judge of the High Court directed in the presence of the parties advocates, that judgment would be delivered on 29th March, 2019 and that on 28th March, 2019 the High Court at Milimani released a cause list for 29th March, 2019 in which they gave notice that judgments which were scheduled before Sergon J. on 29th March, 2019 would be deferred to 30th April, 2019. On 30th April, 2019, the High Court released a cause list for 2nd May, 2019 wherein it was indicated that the judgment in regard to the parties’ case would be delivered on 2nd May, 2019 before Sergon, J. The judgment was accordingly delivered on 2nd May, 2019. Wambua deponed that the applicant had neither applied for certified copies of the proceedings and judgment nor had they served the respondent with any notice of appeal by the time the current application was served on the respondent. The respondent further argued that the intended appeal has very little chance of success.
[4] During the hearing of the motion, the applicant was represented byMr. Ondimawhile the respondent was represented byMs. Gichumbi.
Each urged the Court to find in favour of its client.
[5] I have considered the motion before me. Under Rule 4 of the Court Rules, I have discretion to grant extension of time to enable the applicant file the appeal. However, that discretion must be exercised judicially and the applicant must therefore satisfy the Court that he is deserving of the exercise of such discretion.
[6] The applicant has explained the reason why it did not file the notice of appeal in time. The explanation is that the applicant was not aware of the delivery of the judgment. The replying affidavit sworn by Wambua gives a good explanation as to why the applicant was not aware of the delivery of the judgment. Although the court had initially given the dates to the parties in court, this date was changed twice and communication was only made to the parties through the cause list.
There is no indication that any attempt was made to serve the parties with notice of date for delivery of judgment.
[7] In the circumstances, the explanation given is plausible as it was possible for the applicant not to be aware of the cause list. It is evident that the applicant took action immediately it was made aware of the judgment by filing the notice of appeal on 22nd July, 2019 and the current application on 26th July, 2019.
[8] The applicant has filed a draft memorandum of appeal which appears to be arguable. In the circumstances, it is only fair and just that I exercise my discretion in the applicant’s favour so as to give him an opportunity of being heard on merit. Accordingly, I allow the application and extend time for the applicant to file its appeal and deem the notice of appeal lodged on 22nd July, 2019 filed within time. The applicant shall file a record of appeal within 30 days from today. The applicant shall pay costs of this application to the respondent.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 19thday of June, 2020.
HANNAH OKWENGU
***********************
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true
copy of the original.
Signed
DEPUTY REGISTRAR