[2007] KEHC 2202 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 2202 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff was not on secondment but had accepted a new appointment with the Kenya Airports Authority, thereby ceasing to be a civil servant. The defendant's attempt to redeploy him to the Ministry of Public Works was not supported by law or procedure. However, the court held that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KEHC 2202 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Godfrey A. Okumu; Defendant: Kenya Airports Authority
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 1864 of 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff
Judges
JL Osiemo
Legal Topics
Wrongful Termination, Employment Contracts, Notice Periods, Terminal Benefits
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Wrongful Termination Employment Contracts Notice Periods Terminal Benefits

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Godfrey A. Okumu

Plaintiff

Kenya Airports Authority

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff was wrongfully terminated from employment by the defendant.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff was entitled to reinstatement or damages equivalent to salary up to retirement age.
  3. 3 What terminal dues and notice period payments the plaintiff was entitled to under the employment contract.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff was not on secondment but had accepted a new appointment with the Kenya Airports Authority, thereby ceasing to be a civil servant. The defendant's attempt to redeploy him to the Ministry of Public Works was not supported by law or procedure. However, the court held that the plaintiff was not entitled to reinstatement or salary up to retirement age, as the employment contract allowed for termination by either party with three months' notice or payment in lieu thereof. The plaintiff was entitled to three months' salary in lieu of notice, unpaid salary up to the last day of service, unutilized leave, and pension contributions up to the last day of duty. The...

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • Plaintiff awarded three months' salary in lieu of notice.
  • Plaintiff to receive unpaid salary up to last day of service.