[2017] KEELC 3721 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants' request for extension of time to obtain Land Control Board consents was premature because the necessary preconditions for such an extension had not been met. Specifically, it was unclear whether the land had been formally sub-divided and whether the requisite consents for transfer from the 2nd respondent to the 1st respondent had been obtained. Without these steps, the applicants had no legal basis to seek consents for transfer to themselves. Furthermore, there were pending suits between the parties regarding ownership of the suit property, and the outcome of those suits would directly affect the applicants' entitlement to the orders sought. Granting...
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 3721 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Godfrey Harrun Ohutso; Applicant: John Kibet Sambu Ndege; Applicant: Daniel Moyaka Kagera; Applicant: Martha Prisca Gathigia; Applicant: Charity Mwende Mwania; Applicant: Norah Nyaboke Mose; Applicant: Charles Kyalo Mutie; Applicant: George Oduor Osoro; Applicant: Kaveke Nzuki; Applicant: Susan Mirugi; Applicant: Wilfred Oluoch Migunde; Applicant: David Mugo/Catherine Wachira; Applicant: Anne Judith Atieno; Applicant: Fredrick Maundu Kitili; Applicant: Lydea Moraa Nyamamba; Applicant: Joshua Wambua Mativo; Applicant: John Kihara Mwangi; Applicant: Teresa Nyambura; Applicant: Mary Muthoni Mwangi; Applicant: Beatrice Moraa Mongaka; Applicant: Aura Nambwaya James; Applicant: William Omuketi Emitaro; Applicant: Lucy Wangari Waweru; Applicant: John Ejakait Adungosi/Ruth Tabia Francina; Applicant: Agnes Gathoni Wamae; Applicant: Josephine Bonuke Nyamamba; Applicant: Stephen Mburu Karau; Applicant: Stanley Miriti Lingera; Applicant: Peninah Mukulu Musau; Applicant: Michael Musau Iketu; Applicant: Ignitius Mukhale Wafula; Applicant: John Mureco Kariuki/Marie Lutupian Wepukhulu; Applicant: Nancy Wangari Kariuki; Applicant: Hellen Jeruto Kiptanui; Applicant: Kipngeno Koskey; Applicant: Esther Njeri Kariuki; Applicant: Joah Achieng Ogola; Applicant: Silvia Waithaka; Applicant: Pauline Aoko Ochola; Applicant: Stephen Mutuku Muema/Ruth Nzembi Ndeti; Applicant: Ruth Monyangi Ombwori; Applicant: Ayiero Okaru; Applicant: Joan Achieng Ogola; Applicant: Dorothy Minoo Mutua; Applicant: Hannah Njeri Ng'ang'a; Applicant: Charles Omayo Muumbo; Applicant: Ombati Makua; Applicant: Yunuke Moraa Kengere; Applicant: Elijah Omonywa Ongweno; Applicant: Joseph Wanjau Mugo; Applicant: Joyce Mutio Nyile; Applicant: Mary Wanja; Applicant: Norah Ndunge Henry; Applicant: Cornel Odhiambo Nyambuga; Applicant: Nancy Wairimu Muturi; Respondent: Divisional Intergrated Programmes Ltd; Respondent: Nathan Mutiso; Respondent: Paul Ngei Musesya; Respondent: Nzioki Wambua; Respondent: Joseph Katiku Nguti
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2017
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 188 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- originating summons struck out with costs
- Legal Topics
- Land Control Board Consents, Extension of Time, Sale of Land, Pending Suits, Transfer of Land, Procedural Prematurity
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Godfrey Harrun Ohutso
Applicant
John Kibet Sambu Ndege
Applicant
Daniel Moyaka Kagera
Applicant
Martha Prisca Gathigia
Applicant
Charity Mwende Mwania
Applicant
Norah Nyaboke Mose
Applicant
Charles Kyalo Mutie
Applicant
George Oduor Osoro
Applicant
Kaveke Nzuki
Applicant
Susan Mirugi
Applicant
Wilfred Oluoch Migunde
Applicant
David Mugo/Catherine Wachira
Applicant
Anne Judith Atieno
Applicant
Fredrick Maundu Kitili
Applicant
Lydea Moraa Nyamamba
Applicant
Joshua Wambua Mativo
Applicant
John Kihara Mwangi
Applicant
Teresa Nyambura
Applicant
Mary Muthoni Mwangi
Applicant
Beatrice Moraa Mongaka
Applicant
Aura Nambwaya James
Applicant
William Omuketi Emitaro
Applicant
Lucy Wangari Waweru
Applicant
John Ejakait Adungosi/Ruth Tabia Francina
Applicant
Agnes Gathoni Wamae
Applicant
Josephine Bonuke Nyamamba
Applicant
Stephen Mburu Karau
Applicant
Stanley Miriti Lingera
Applicant
Peninah Mukulu Musau
Applicant
Michael Musau Iketu
Applicant
Ignitius Mukhale Wafula
Applicant
John Mureco Kariuki/Marie Lutupian Wepukhulu
Applicant
Nancy Wangari Kariuki
Applicant
Hellen Jeruto Kiptanui
Applicant
Kipngeno Koskey
Applicant
Esther Njeri Kariuki
Applicant
Joah Achieng Ogola
Applicant
Silvia Waithaka
Applicant
Pauline Aoko Ochola
Applicant
Stephen Mutuku Muema/Ruth Nzembi Ndeti
Applicant
Ruth Monyangi Ombwori
Applicant
Ayiero Okaru
Applicant
Joan Achieng Ogola
Applicant
Dorothy Minoo Mutua
Applicant
Hannah Njeri Ng'ang'a
Applicant
Charles Omayo Muumbo
Applicant
Ombati Makua
Applicant
Yunuke Moraa Kengere
Applicant
Elijah Omonywa Ongweno
Applicant
Joseph Wanjau Mugo
Applicant
Joyce Mutio Nyile
Applicant
Mary Wanja
Applicant
Norah Ndunge Henry
Applicant
Cornel Odhiambo Nyambuga
Applicant
Nancy Wairimu Muturi
Applicant
Divisional Intergrated Programmes Ltd
Respondent
Nathan Mutiso
Respondent
Paul Ngei Musesya
Respondent
Nzioki Wambua
Respondent
Joseph Katiku Nguti
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to an extension of time to obtain Land Control Board consents for transfer of plots purchased from the respondents.
- 2 Whether the application for extension of time is premature in light of unresolved issues regarding sub-division and transfer of the suit property.
- 3 Whether pending suits affecting ownership of the suit property preclude the granting of the orders sought.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants' request for extension of time to obtain Land Control Board consents was premature because the necessary preconditions for such an extension had not been met. Specifically, it was unclear whether the land had been formally sub-divided and whether the requisite consents for transfer from the 2nd respondent to the 1st respondent had been obtained. Without these steps, the applicants had no legal basis to seek consents for transfer to themselves. Furthermore, there were pending suits between the parties regarding ownership of the suit property, and the outcome of those suits would directly affect the applicants' entitlement to the orders sought. Granting...
Court Disposition
originating summons struck out with costs
Orders
- The Originating Summons dated 2nd December, 2014 is struck out.
- Applicants to pay the costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment