https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/1486

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/1486

The appeal had already abated by operation of law because no substitution application was made within twelve months of the appellant's death, and since no application to revive the abated appeal was brought, there was no live appeal before the court capable of substitution or further prosecution.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KECA 1486 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Godfrey Kibuthu Njora; Respondent: Harrison Njuguna Kahiga
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal (Application) 322 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (application) / Application for Substitution After Appellant's Death
Outcome
Application dismissed
Judges
["LA Achode"]
Legal Topics
Substitution of Deceased Appellant, Abatement of Appeal, Revival of Abated Appeal, Grant of Letters of Administration Ad Litem, Time Limits Under Court of Appeal Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appellate Practice Succession Law Substitution of Deceased Appellant Abatement of Appeal Revival of Abated Appeal Grant of Letters of Administration Ad Litem Time Limits Under Court of Appeal Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Godfrey Kibuthu Njora

Appellant

Harrison Njuguna Kahiga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (application) / Application for Substitution After Appellant's Death

  1. 1 Whether the application for substitution was competent after expiry of the twelve-month period under rule 102(2).
  2. 2 Whether the appeal had abated by operation of law upon failure to seek substitution within time.
  3. 3 Whether the court could substitute the deceased appellant without a simultaneous application to revive the appeal under rule 102(3).

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal had already abated by operation of law because no substitution application was made within twelve months of the appellant's death, and since no application to revive the abated appeal was brought, there was no live appeal before the court capable of substitution or further prosecution.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 15th August, 2023 is dismissed for want of merit.