[2005] KEHC 2694 (KLR)
The court found that although the appellant was convicted on his own plea of guilty for church-breaking and handling stolen goods, the sentence of 5 years imprisonment and 3 strokes of the cane was excessive in light of his guilty plea, remorse, and the period already served (about 2 years). The court exercised its...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KEHC 2694 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Godfrey Ngotho Ndungu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 238 of 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed to the extent of reducing sentence and setting aside corporal punishment; appeal abated due to appellant's death.
- Judges
- A. Ong’injo
- Legal Topics
- Church Breaking, Handling Stolen Goods, Sentencing, Plea of Guilty
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Godfrey Ngotho Ndungu
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the appellant for church-breaking and handling stolen goods was harsh and excessive.
- 2 Whether the appellant's guilty plea and remorse warranted a reduction of sentence.
- 3 Whether the corporal punishment imposed was lawful.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the appellant was convicted on his own plea of guilty for church-breaking and handling stolen goods, the sentence of 5 years imprisonment and 3 strokes of the cane was excessive in light of his guilty plea, remorse, and the period already served (about 2 years). The court exercised its discretion to reduce the sentence to the period already served and set aside the corporal punishment, as it is no longer lawful. However, before the judgment could be delivered, the appellant died, and the appeal was marked as abated.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed to the extent of reducing sentence and setting aside corporal punishment; appeal abated due to appellant's death.
Orders
- Sentence reduced to period already served.
- Three strokes of the cane set aside as corporal punishment is outlawed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU
CRIMINAL APPEAL 238 OF 2003
GODFREY NGOTHO NDUNGU……………………..…………..APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC…………………………………………….………..RESPONDENT
JUDGEMENT
The Appellant has appealed against the original and conviction and sentence in PM Court, Nyahururu No. 1760 of 2003. In that case the Appellant had been charged for the offence of Church –breaking and committing a felony, contrary to Sec. 306(2) of the Penal Code. The Alternative Charge is that of Handling Stolen Goods, contrary to Sec. 322(2) of the Penal Code. The facts of the prosecution case as stated in the charge sheet are as follows:
“On the night of 14th /15th May, 2003 at Limunga Village in Laikipia District within the Rift Valley Province, broke and entered into a building namely St. Peters Catholic Church and committed a felony namely theft of fifteen picture frames, two cabinet drawers and two packets of candles all valued at Kshs.5,000/= the property of the said Church.” Alternative Charge:
“On the 15th May, 2003 at Maili Saba area, in Laikipia District within the Rift Valley Province, otherwise than in the course of stealing dishonestly received or retained fifteen picture frames, two cabinet drawers and two packets of candles knowing or having reason to believe them to be stolen goods.” When the Appellant appeared before the Learned Magistrate viz, Mr. D. K. Ngomo, PM he pleaded “Guilty” and he was convicted accordingly. Consequently, he was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and 3 stokes of the cane. During the hearing of the appeal, the Appellant complained that the sentence was harsh and excessive. He concluded that the sentence should be reduced.
On the other hand, the state through Mr. Gumo, Ass. DPP has deposed that the sentence was deserving since the Appellant has not shown any remorse. Besides the above, Mr. Gumo has also submitted that the appellant has offered both God and human beings. In reply the Appellant stated that he was asthmatic and he also prayed for forgiveness before God and the Court.
According to Section 306 of the Penal Code, Cap. 63, Laws of Kenya, the maximum sentence provided by law is 7 years imprisonment. In this case, the Appellant pleaded “Guilty” and hence saved the Court’s time. The Appellant has now served about 2 years imprisonment. He has asked for forgiveness and claims to be remorseful. The court in its discretion hereby reduces the sentence to the period already served. In addition to the above, I hereby set aside the 3 strokes of the cane since corporal punishment has been outlawed. It is only to that extent that the appeal is hereby allowed.
MUGA APONDI
JUDGE
Judgement read, signed, delivered in open court in the presence of
MUGA APONDI
JUDGE
31st March, 2005
Before: Muga Apondi – Judge
Gumo – Ass. DPP
GUMO: I have received a signal from the Prison that the Appellant died on 4th March, 2005 at the Nakuru Provincial General Hospital. I pray that his appeal be marked as abated.
COURT: Though the judgement is ready, the appeal is now marked as abated due to the death of the Appellant.
MUGA APONDI
JUDGE
31ST MARCH, 2005