[2019] KEELRC 989 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 989 (KLR)

The court found that although sleeping at work can be a valid ground for dismissal, the Respondent failed to provide evidence that the Claimant was properly terminated for this reason or for desertion. There was no termination letter on record, and the Claimant was not subjected to a fair disciplinary hearing as...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 989 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Godfrey Nyamori Omoke; Respondent: Crest Security Services Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 684 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim partly allowed.
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Summary Dismissal, Disciplinary Procedure, Notice Pay
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Summary Dismissal Disciplinary Procedure Notice Pay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Godfrey Nyamori Omoke

Claimant

Crest Security Services Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the Claimant's employment was unfair and unlawful.
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to compensation for unfair termination and notice pay.
  3. 3 Whether the Claimant is entitled to salary for the balance of the contract period and refund of uniform deductions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although sleeping at work can be a valid ground for dismissal, the Respondent failed to provide evidence that the Claimant was properly terminated for this reason or for desertion. There was no termination letter on record, and the Claimant was not subjected to a fair disciplinary hearing as required by law. The employer did not discharge its statutory burden under Section 43 of the Employment Act to prove the reasons for termination, nor did it comply with the procedural requirements of Sections 41 and 45. Consequently, the termination was unfair. However, given the Claimant's short period of service (less than one month), he was not entitled to compensation for the...

Court Disposition

Claim partly allowed.

Orders

  • Termination was unfair.
  • Respondent to pay Claimant Kshs. 5,250 as compensation for unfair termination and Kshs. 10,500 as one month's salary in lieu of notice, totaling Kshs. 15,750.