[2012] KEHC 1823 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 1823 (KLR)

The court found that, following interlocutory judgment on liability, the only issue for determination was the assessment of damages. The court considered the medical evidence and documentary proof of expenses for each plaintiff. For the 1st plaintiff, the court found the injuries to be minor soft tissue injuries and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEHC 1823 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Godfrey Nyandera Abwawo; Plaintiff: Martha Adhiambo Nyandera; Plaintiff: Laban Okoth Ominde; Defendant: Mothers Favourite Bakeries Co. Ltd (In Receivership); Defendant: Ndaison Kamau
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 2182 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment on Assessment of Damages After Interlocutory Judgment on Default of Appearance and Defence
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiffs against the defendants jointly and severally for general and special damages as assessed, with interest and costs.
Judges
GV Odunga
Legal Topics
Road Traffic Accidents, Negligence, Assessment of Damages, Personal Injury, Vicarious Liability
Source Language
en
Tort Law Civil Procedure Road Traffic Accidents Negligence Assessment of Damages Personal Injury Vicarious Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Godfrey Nyandera Abwawo

Plaintiff

Martha Adhiambo Nyandera

Plaintiff

Laban Okoth Ominde

Plaintiff

Mothers Favourite Bakeries Co. Ltd (In Receivership)

Defendant

Ndaison Kamau

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Judgment on Assessment of Damages After Interlocutory Judgment on Default of Appearance and Defence

  1. 1 Whether the defendants are liable in negligence for the road traffic accident involving the plaintiffs.
  2. 2 What is the appropriate quantum of general and special damages for each plaintiff arising from the injuries and losses sustained.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, following interlocutory judgment on liability, the only issue for determination was the assessment of damages. The court considered the medical evidence and documentary proof of expenses for each plaintiff. For the 1st plaintiff, the court found the injuries to be minor soft tissue injuries and awarded general damages accordingly, with special damages limited to what was specifically pleaded and proved. For the 2nd plaintiff, the court recognized the severity of injuries, including amputation, and awarded substantial general damages based on comparable case law, as well as special damages as pleaded and proved. For the 3rd plaintiff, the court assessed the injuries...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiffs against the defendants jointly and severally for general and special damages as assessed, with interest and costs.

Orders

  • 1st Plaintiff awarded Kshs. 60,000.00 general damages, Kshs. 6,900.00 special damages, interest at court rates, and costs.
  • 2nd Plaintiff awarded Kshs. 2,000,000.00 general damages, Kshs. 360,278.10 special damages, interest, and costs.