[2021] KEHC 1690 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 1690 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to provide any sufficient or reasonable explanation for the delay in seeking leave to appeal out of time. The contradiction in the date of judgment and the absence of any reasons advanced for the inordinate delay led the court to conclude that the applicant was guilty of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 1690 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Godfrey Ochieng Nalo alias Katoto; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E118 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Conviction and Sentence, Rape Offence, Inordinate Delay
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Leave to Appeal Out of Time Conviction and Sentence Rape Offence Inordinate Delay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Godfrey Ochieng Nalo alias Katoto

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason for the delay in filing an appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether leave to appeal out of time should be granted in the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to provide any sufficient or reasonable explanation for the delay in seeking leave to appeal out of time. The contradiction in the date of judgment and the absence of any reasons advanced for the inordinate delay led the court to conclude that the applicant was guilty of unexplained laches. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to decline the application for leave to appeal out of time and dismissed the application.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal out of time is dismissed.
  • File closed.