[2020] KEELC 1414 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 1414 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's delay in filing the notice of appeal was excusable due to the extraordinary circumstances caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, which restricted movement and delayed communication between the applicant and his advocate. The explanation provided was reasonable and justified the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 1414 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Godfrey Oduori Ondero; Respondent: Redemptor Teddy Were; Respondent: Albert Hussein Karani
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Busia
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 32 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application to Extend Time and Stay Execution
Outcome
Application allowed in part.
Judges
AA Omollo
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Stay of Execution, Covid19 Related Delay, Security for Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time Stay of Execution Covid19 Related Delay Security for Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Godfrey Oduori Ondero

Applicant

Redemptor Teddy Were

Respondent

Albert Hussein Karani

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application to Extend Time and Stay Execution

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient cause for extension of time to file a notice of appeal against the judgment delivered on 15th April 2020.
  2. 2 Whether a stay of execution of the taxed costs should be granted pending appeal.
  3. 3 Whether security for costs should be ordered as a condition for stay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's delay in filing the notice of appeal was excusable due to the extraordinary circumstances caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, which restricted movement and delayed communication between the applicant and his advocate. The explanation provided was reasonable and justified the exercise of the court's discretion to extend time. The respondents did not object to the extension, further supporting the grant of the order. Regarding stay of execution, the court held that it was in the interest of justice to grant a stay of execution of the taxed costs to enable the applicant to pursue his appeal. However, to protect the respondents' interests, the applicant was...

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part.

Orders

  • Time for filing notice of appeal against the judgment of 15th April 2020 is extended by fourteen (14) days from the date of this ruling.
  • Stay of execution of the taxed costs is granted, conditional upon the applicant depositing 50% of the taxed costs in an escrow account in the joint names of the advocates within 60 days.