[2015] KEHC 4549 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 4549 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had satisfied the requirements of Section 36(1) of the Arbitration Act by presenting a valid arbitral award and seeking its adoption as a decree of the court. The application was duly served and remained unopposed. The court was satisfied that the application was merited and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 4549 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Golden Homes (Management) Limited; Respondent: Mohammed Fakhrudinn Abdullai; Respondent: Alibhai Habiba Mohamed; Interested Party: Golden Homes Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 157 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Arbitral Award as Court Decree
Outcome
Application allowed as prayed.
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Arbitral Award Enforcement, Recognition of Awards, Costs and Interest, Application for Decree
Source Language
en
Alternative Dispute Resolution Civil Procedure Arbitral Award Enforcement Recognition of Awards Costs and Interest Application for Decree

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Golden Homes (Management) Limited

Applicant

Mohammed Fakhrudinn Abdullai

Respondent

Alibhai Habiba Mohamed

Respondent

Golden Homes Limited

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Arbitral Award as Court Decree

  1. 1 Whether the arbitral award made on 21st November 2014 should be adopted as a decree of the court.
  2. 2 Whether the application complies with Section 36(1) of the Arbitration Act.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had satisfied the requirements of Section 36(1) of the Arbitration Act by presenting a valid arbitral award and seeking its adoption as a decree of the court. The application was duly served and remained unopposed. The court was satisfied that the application was merited and complied with the law, and therefore allowed the application as prayed, granting the adoption of the arbitral award as a decree of the court with costs in the cause.

Court Disposition

Application allowed as prayed.

Orders

  • The arbitral award made by Ms. Sylvia Michelle Kithinji on 21st November 2014 is adopted as a decree of the court.
  • Costs of the application to be in the cause.