[2023] KEELC 174 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 174 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant complied with its order of December 19, 2022, by filing the intended appeal within the seven-day period granted. The respondent's counsel confirmed the filing of the appeal, and the court independently verified that the appeal was lodged on December 20, 2022. As the order had been...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 174 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Richard Ong’Ou Gomba; Respondent: John Odhiambo Owuor
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 12 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Compliance With Prior Orders Regarding Filing of Appeal
Outcome
application determined; no orders as to costs
Judges
GMA Ongondo
Legal Topics
Extension of Time to Appeal, Compliance With Court Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time to Appeal Compliance With Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Ong’Ou Gomba

Applicant

John Odhiambo Owuor

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Compliance With Prior Orders Regarding Filing of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant complied with the court's order to file the intended appeal within the stipulated time period.
  2. 2 Whether any further orders or costs should be issued following compliance.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant complied with its order of December 19, 2022, by filing the intended appeal within the seven-day period granted. The respondent's counsel confirmed the filing of the appeal, and the court independently verified that the appeal was lodged on December 20, 2022. As the order had been complied with, there was no basis for further orders or for awarding costs. The application was therefore determined with no orders as to costs.

Court Disposition

application determined; no orders as to costs

Orders

  • The application is determined with no orders as to costs.