[2024] KEHC 12662 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 12662 (KLR)

The court held that the ex parte applicant failed to comply with the mandatory procedural requirement of swearing an affidavit in verification of the statutory statement of facts. This omission rendered the application fatally defective and incapable of sustaining a grant of leave to apply for judicial review...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 12662 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Hellen Achien Gonyango; Respondent: The Chief Finance Officer Ministry of Information Communication & Digital Economy; Respondent: The Hon Attorney General
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review E020 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Leave Application
Outcome
application struck out
Judges
MS Shariff
Legal Topics
Judicial Review Procedure, Leave to Apply, Verification of Affidavit
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Judicial Review Procedure Leave to Apply Verification of Affidavit

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hellen Achien Gonyango

Applicant

The Chief Finance Officer Ministry of Information Communication & Digital Economy

Respondent

The Hon Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Ruling on Leave Application

  1. 1 Whether the absence of a sworn affidavit verifying the statutory statement of facts renders the application for leave for judicial review incompetent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the ex parte applicant failed to comply with the mandatory procedural requirement of swearing an affidavit in verification of the statutory statement of facts. This omission rendered the application fatally defective and incapable of sustaining a grant of leave to apply for judicial review orders. The absence of a verifying affidavit means the application does not meet the threshold set by the Civil Procedure Rules and the Law Reform Act, and therefore must be struck out.

Court Disposition

application struck out

Orders

  • The application is struck out with no orders as to costs.
  • The file is marked as closed.