[2020] KEELRC 562 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to meet the threshold for review as set out in Rule 33(1) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016. The applicant did not present any new or important matter that could not have been discovered with reasonable diligence at the time of the earlier...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELRC 562 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Grace Akinyi Ahawo; Respondent: Kenya Airports Authority
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 985 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Ruling on Motion to Review or Set Aside Previous Order on Decretal Sum
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the respondent
- Judges
- MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Review of Court Orders, Decretal Sum Computation, Garnishee Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Grace Akinyi Ahawo
Applicant
Kenya Airports Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Ruling on Motion to Review or Set Aside Previous Order on Decretal Sum
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant met the threshold for review or setting aside the court's previous order on the decretal sum.
- 2 Whether the introduction of interest on the decretal sum constitutes a new matter warranting review.
- 3 Whether the application is res judicata due to previous similar applications.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to meet the threshold for review as set out in Rule 33(1) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016. The applicant did not present any new or important matter that could not have been discovered with reasonable diligence at the time of the earlier applications. The attempt to introduce interest on the decretal sum was not considered a newly discovered matter. The court also noted that similar issues had been raised and determined in previous applications, making the current application res judicata. Any alleged mistake in the previous ruling should be addressed through appellate jurisdiction, not review. Consequently,...
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Orders
- The motion dated 27 February 2020 is dismissed.
- Costs awarded to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 985 OF 2014
GRACE AKINYI AHAWO............................................................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
KENYA AIRPORTS AUTHORITY.......................................................RESPONDENT
RULING NO. 5
1. Before the Court is a motion dated 27 February 2020 in which the Claimant seeks orders
1. THATthis Honourable Court do review/or set aside its order of 31st January 2020 directing that the decretal sum due is Kshs 65,546/-.
2. THAT this Honourable Court do issue an order that the Respondent do pay the Claimant the balance of the decretal sum of Kshs 71,483/20 within 7 days or any other time-limited by Court.
3. THAT the said balance be attached by way of order absolute in the account by the garnishee in the Judgment debtors name, Kenya Airport Authority account No. 1001206024 to satisfy the balance of the decretal sum of Kshs 71,483/20 together with garnishee cost of Kshs 15,000/- in non-compliance of order No. 2 above.
4. THAT costs be provided for.
2. The grounds/reasons which were advanced in support the application were that the Claimant had not tabulated the amounts due by 11 June 2019 when filing the garnishee application; that the Respondent had initially made payment of Kshs 625,655/- leaving a balance of Kshs 137,029/- and that out of this later balance, the Respondent made a payment of Kshs 65,546/- (after Court order on 31 January 2020) thus leaving a balance of Kshs 71,483/20.
3. The Respondent filed Grounds of Opposition to the motion and its submissions on 16 June 2020.
4. According to the Respondent, the application was an abuse of the court process, vexatious and frivolous and did not meet the review test as envisaged by Rule 33(1) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016.
5. Taking the arguments further, the Respondent contended that the motion did not set out or disclose any newly discovered matter of evidence which could not have been discovered by the exercise of diligence and that the addition of interest on the balance claimed could not be a discovery.
6. Further, the Respondent contended that the Court had dealt with previous applications wherein the Claimant had raised similar issues and the Claimant was thus revisiting questions the Court had addressed. The application, it was asserted, was res judicata.
7. The Court has considered the rival facts and submissions placed before it by the parties. The Court agrees with the Respondent that the application does not meet the review threshold.
8. Among the new items introduced by the Claimant was interest on the decretal sum.
9. In the view of the Court, that item should have been presented by the Claimant when filing the earlier applications.
10. Further, this is not the first review and/or execution application filed by the Claimant.
11. Lastly, if at all, the Court made a mistake in its Ruling No. 4 delivered on 31 January 2020, such a mistake should be the subject of appellate jurisdiction, as there is no apparent error demonstrated on the face of the record.
12. The motion is dismissed with costs to the Respondent.
Delivered through Microsoft teams, dated and signed in Nairobi on this 6th day of August 2020.
Radido Stephen
Judge
Appearances
For Claimant Mr. Ojienda instructed by Ojienda & Co. Advocates
For Respondent Ms. Kanyiri instructed by the Federation of Kenya Employers
Court Assistant Judy Maina