[2018] KEELC 275 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated apprehension of substantial loss if the stay was not granted, particularly the risk of subdivision and loss of her land and developments thereon. Given the urgency and the ex parte nature of the application, the court granted a temporary stay of execution of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELC 275 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Grace Cianjoka Nthigai; Respondent: Ider Keerua; Respondent: Joseline Mwimbi; Respondent: Harriet Kanini
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Appeal 09 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ex Parte Interim Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Interim stay of execution granted pending inter partes hearing; security for costs ordered.
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Land Ownership Disputes, Security for Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Grace Cianjoka Nthigai
Appellant
Ider Keerua
Respondent
Joseline Mwimbi
Respondent
Harriet Kanini
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ex Parte Interim Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment and decree pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicant will suffer substantial loss if stay is not granted.
- 3 Whether security for due performance should be ordered as a condition for stay.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated apprehension of substantial loss if the stay was not granted, particularly the risk of subdivision and loss of her land and developments thereon. Given the urgency and the ex parte nature of the application, the court granted a temporary stay of execution of the lower court's judgment and decree pending the inter partes hearing. The court further ordered the applicant to deposit Kshs. 50,000 as security for the due performance of the decree, in line with the requirements for granting stay under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The court considered that no party would suffer prejudice by the grant of interim orders and that...
Court Disposition
Interim stay of execution granted pending inter partes hearing; security for costs ordered.
Orders
- Prayer 2 for stay of execution is granted pending hearing of the application.
- Applicant to deposit Kshs. 50,000 as security within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
48 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA
CHUKA ELC CIVIL APPEAL CASE NO. 09 OF 2018
GRACE CIANJOKA NTHIGAI………………………………APPELLANT
VERSUS
IDER KEERUA………………………………………….1ST RESPONDENT
JOSELINE MWIMBI ………………………………….2ND RESPONDENT
HARRIET KANINI ……………………………………3RD RESPONDENT
RULING
1. This application is dated 18th December, 2018 and seeks orders:
1. That this application be certified urgent and service be dispensed with in the first instance and the court be pleased to grant prayer 2 herein.
2. That pending the hearing and determination of this appeal, this court be pleased to grant stay of execution of the judgment and decree of the Chief Magistrate Court Chuka Civil Suit No. 124 of 2016 issued on 21st November, 2018.
3. The cost of this application be provided for.
2. The application has the following grounds:
1. That judgment in the lower cort was delivered on 21st November, 2018.
2. That the respondents are now bent on subdividing and executing the court orders of 21st November, 2018.
3. That the applicant is apprehensive that the respondents may engage services of a surveyor anytime thereby subdividing the suit land LR; Karingani/Mugirirwa/3423.
4. That if stay is not granted the applicant is bound to suffer loss and damages for her developments on the suit land will be demolished and destroyed.
5. That the applicant is apprehensive that the one acre that the plaintiff/respondents were awarded by the court may be curved from the applicant’s parcel of land LR; Karingani/Mugirirwa/3423.
6. That the applicant stands to suffer immense loss and ought to be rendered landless and destitute for she will be left with a very small piece of land.
7. That the applicant holds LR; Karingani/Mugirirwa/3423 absolutely and does not hold the same in trust for anybody.
8. That the orders sought are the best and most apt in the circumstances.
9. That no party stands to suffer any prejudice in the event the orders sought are granted for they will meet the ends of justice.
3. The application is supported by the affidavit of Grace Cianjoka Nthigai sworn on 18th December, 2018 which states:
I, GRACE CIANJOKA NTHIGA a resident of Chuka in Tharaka Nithi County and of Post Box Number 52-60400 Chuka hereby make oath and swear as follows:
1. That I am an adult female of sound mind hence competent to swear this affidavit.
2. That I am the registered owner of the property known as L.R. No. Karingani/Mugirirwa/3423.
3. That judgment in this suit was delivered on 21st November, 2018.
4. That the respondents are now bent on subdividing and executing the court orders of 21st November, 2018.
5. That I was condemned unheard which is an affront to the principles of natural justice that a person should not be condemned unheard.
6. That I am apprehensive that the respondent may engage services of a surveyor anytime thereby subdividing the land.
7. That if stay is not granted I am bound to suffer loss and damages for her developments on the suit land will be demolished and destroyed.
8. That I am apprehensive that the one acre that the plaintiff/respondents were awarded by the court may be curved from the applicant’s parcel of land LR; Karingani/Mugirirwa/3423.
9. That I stand to suffer immense loss and ought to be rendered landless and destitute for she will be left with a very small piece of land.
10. That I hold LR; Karingani/Mugirirwa/3423 absolutely and does not hold the same in trust for anybody.
11. That the orders sought are the best and most apt in the circumstances.
12. That no party stand to suffer any prejudice in the event the orders sought are granted for they will meet the ends of justice.
13. That what I have deponed to herein above is true to the best of my knowledge save to information sources whereof have been disclosed and matters deponed to on belief the grounds whereupon have been given.
4. I have perused the pleadings and heard the applicant’s advocate. At this exparte stage, I issue the following orders:
a) Prayer 2 is granted pending hearing of this application.
b)The applicant is ordered to deposit with court the sum of Kshs.50,000/= as deposit for security within the next 14 days.
c) This application should be served upon the respondents within the next 10 days.
d)Interpartes hearing on 3. 4.2019
Delivered in open Court at Chuka this 19th day of December, 2018 in the presence of:
CA: Ndegwa
Dennis Muthomi for the appellant/applicant
P.M. NJOROGE
JUDGE