[2018] KEELC 479 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 479 (KLR)

The court found that the Notice of Appeal was filed out of time, contrary to Rule 75 of the Court of Appeal Rules, which requires filing within 14 days of judgment. The court further held that the defendants failed to demonstrate sufficient cause or provide security for the performance of the decree as required...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 479 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Grace Jendeka Lusiola; Defendant: Elias Mbai Ndungu; Defendant: Paul Irungu Kamau; Defendant: John Munene Nyagah; Defendant: Jennifer Gathoni; Defendant: Florence Wakonyo; Defendant: Samuel Wambugu; Defendant: Mary Njeri; Defendant: Raphael Muiru; Defendant: John Ngugi Njuguna; Defendant: Florence Muriithi; Defendant: George Kiura Mugo; Defendant: Raphael Ndirangu Matu; Defendant: Jacinta W Karanja; Defendant: James Kamau Kitati; Defendant: Virginia W Karanja; Defendant: Paul Nganga Nderitu; Defendant: Henry Gitau Ndirangu; Defendant: Doris K. Maitima; Defendant: Joseph Munyao Katiku; Defendant: Lucy Wangari Kamau
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 650 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the plaintiff; leave granted to defendants to appoint a new advocate
Judges
AK Bor
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Appeal Timelines, Security for Performance, Residential Property Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Appeal Timelines Security for Performance Residential Property Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Grace Jendeka Lusiola

Plaintiff

Elias Mbai Ndungu

Defendant

Paul Irungu Kamau

Defendant

John Munene Nyagah

Defendant

Jennifer Gathoni

Defendant

Florence Wakonyo

Defendant

Samuel Wambugu

Defendant

Mary Njeri

Defendant

Raphael Muiru

Defendant

John Ngugi Njuguna

Defendant

Florence Muriithi

Defendant

George Kiura Mugo

Defendant

Raphael Ndirangu Matu

Defendant

Jacinta W Karanja

Defendant

James Kamau Kitati

Defendant

Virginia W Karanja

Defendant

Paul Nganga Nderitu

Defendant

Henry Gitau Ndirangu

Defendant

Doris K. Maitima

Defendant

Joseph Munyao Katiku

Defendant

Lucy Wangari Kamau

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the defendants are entitled to a stay of execution of the decree pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the Notice of Appeal was filed within the prescribed time under Rule 75 of the Court of Appeal Rules.
  3. 3 Whether sufficient cause and security for the performance of the decree have been shown by the defendants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Notice of Appeal was filed out of time, contrary to Rule 75 of the Court of Appeal Rules, which requires filing within 14 days of judgment. The court further held that the defendants failed to demonstrate sufficient cause or provide security for the performance of the decree as required under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The court exercised its discretion to deny the stay of execution, finding no basis to grant the orders sought. However, the court granted the defendants leave to appoint a new advocate.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the plaintiff; leave granted to defendants to appoint a new advocate

Orders

  • The application for stay of execution is dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.
  • The defendants are granted leave to appoint a new advocate.