[2014] KEHC 2446 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 2446 (KLR)

The court adopted the consent of the parties as its order, granting the defendants leave to file and serve their defence and counterclaim within seven days. The court found that since the application was not opposed and the parties had agreed to the terms, there was no reason to deny the orders sought. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 2446 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Grace Kamene M'Berece; Defendant: Joyce Rigiri c/o David Mbogori; Defendant: John Mbogori
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 86 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Defence and Counterclaim
Outcome
Application allowed by consent; leave granted to file defence and counterclaim within seven days; costs in the cause.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Leave to File Defence, Counterclaim Procedure, Consent Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Leave to File Defence Counterclaim Procedure Consent Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Grace Kamene M'Berece

Plaintiff

Joyce Rigiri c/o David Mbogori

Defendant

John Mbogori

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Defence and Counterclaim

  1. 1 Whether the defendants should be granted leave to file their defence and counterclaim out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the draft statement of defence and counterclaim should be deemed as filed and served upon payment of filing fees.
  3. 3 Who should bear the costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court adopted the consent of the parties as its order, granting the defendants leave to file and serve their defence and counterclaim within seven days. The court found that since the application was not opposed and the parties had agreed to the terms, there was no reason to deny the orders sought. The court further ordered that costs of the application be in the cause, reflecting the consensual nature of the resolution. The ruling underscores the court's willingness to facilitate the just, expeditious, and affordable resolution of disputes by endorsing procedural agreements reached by parties, provided they are not contrary to law or public policy.

Court Disposition

Application allowed by consent; leave granted to file defence and counterclaim within seven days; costs in the cause.

Orders

  • Defendants to file and serve defence and counterclaim within seven days from 19th June 2014.
  • Costs of the application dated 27.5.2014 to be in the cause.