[2010] KEHC 3430 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 3430 (KLR)

The Plaintiffs, having produced the title deed and certificate of official search, proved that they are the lawfully registered proprietors of the suit land. The Defendants, having failed to respond or appear, did not establish any lawful claim to the land. The court found no evidence to support the claim for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] KEHC 3430 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Grace Mumbua Matilu; Plaintiff: Titus Musembi Matilu; Defendant: George Noah Kivuvo; Defendant: Nzioka King’oli; Defendant: Nzioka Kinyaka (Kinama alias Nzioka Kieti)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 63 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiffs' claim for eviction granted; claim for damages dismissed; no order as to costs.
Judges
I Lenaola
Legal Topics
Ownership of Land, Eviction, Title Deeds, Registration of Land
Source Language
en
Land and Property Ownership of Land Eviction Title Deeds Registration of Land

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Grace Mumbua Matilu

Plaintiff

Titus Musembi Matilu

Plaintiff

George Noah Kivuvo

Defendant

Nzioka King’oli

Defendant

Nzioka Kinyaka (Kinama alias Nzioka Kieti)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiffs are the lawfully registered proprietors of land parcel Kangundo/Mbusyani/1684.
  2. 2 Whether the Defendants have any lawful claim to the suit land.
  3. 3 Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to an order of eviction against the Defendants.

Ratio Decidendi

The Plaintiffs, having produced the title deed and certificate of official search, proved that they are the lawfully registered proprietors of the suit land. The Defendants, having failed to respond or appear, did not establish any lawful claim to the land. The court found no evidence to support the claim for damages for non-user. Consequently, the Plaintiffs were entitled to an order of eviction against the Defendants, but not to damages, as no evidence was tendered on that issue.

Court Disposition

Plaintiffs' claim for eviction granted; claim for damages dismissed; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Defendants to be evicted from land parcel Kangundo/Mbusyani/1684.
  • Claim for damages for non-user is dismissed.