[2021] KEHC 1652 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 1652 (KLR)

The High Court found, upon perusal of the trial court record, that there was no mistake or error in law or procedure in the sentencing process. The trial court had ordered a pre-sentence report and considered the fact that the convict was a first offender. The applicants' contention that their views were not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 1652 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Grace Mumbua Mbai; Applicant: Angela Kalondu; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Makueni
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E001 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
GMA Dulu
Legal Topics
Sentencing Review, Revision Jurisdiction, Complainant Rights
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Sentencing Review Revision Jurisdiction Complainant Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Grace Mumbua Mbai

Applicant

Angela Kalondu

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the trial court erred in law or procedure by failing to consider the complainants' views during sentencing.
  2. 2 Whether the sentence imposed by the trial court was illegal or improper warranting revision by the High Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court found, upon perusal of the trial court record, that there was no mistake or error in law or procedure in the sentencing process. The trial court had ordered a pre-sentence report and considered the fact that the convict was a first offender. The applicants' contention that their views were not considered did not amount to an illegality or error justifying revision. The sentence imposed was lawful and within the trial court's discretion. Therefore, there was no basis for the High Court to interfere with or revise the sentence.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for review of sentence is dismissed.
  • The sentence of the trial court stands.