[2014] KEHC 2803 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 2803 (KLR)

The court found that the issues raised in the affidavits, particularly regarding the existence and status of the asset Githunguri/Kiairia/2232 and the alleged oral distribution of the estate by the deceased, require further probing. The evidence presented was insufficient to conclusively determine the proper...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 2803 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Grace Nyambura Mbugua; Applicant: Amos Ndungu Mbugua; Respondent: Felix Kimani Mbugua; Respondent: Monica Wanjiru Mbugua Mwenja
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 1040 of 2004
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
Application for confirmation of grant to be disposed of by way of affidavit and oral evidence; matter set for hearing.
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Confirmation of Grant, Distribution of Estate, Succession of Property, Oral Gift Inter Vivos
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Confirmation of Grant Distribution of Estate Succession of Property Oral Gift Inter Vivos

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Grace Nyambura Mbugua

Applicant

Amos Ndungu Mbugua

Applicant

Felix Kimani Mbugua

Respondent

Monica Wanjiru Mbugua Mwenja

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the grant of representation to the estate of the deceased should be confirmed as proposed by the applicant.
  2. 2 Whether the asset Githunguri/Kiairia/2232 exists and is available for distribution.
  3. 3 Whether the deceased had orally distributed his estate prior to death.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the issues raised in the affidavits, particularly regarding the existence and status of the asset Githunguri/Kiairia/2232 and the alleged oral distribution of the estate by the deceased, require further probing. The evidence presented was insufficient to conclusively determine the proper distribution of the estate or to confirm the grant as proposed by the applicant. The court held that the application for confirmation of grant could only be effectively disposed of after hearing both affidavit and oral evidence from the parties, given the contested facts and the need to clarify the status of the estate's assets and the rights of all beneficiaries.

Court Disposition

Application for confirmation of grant to be disposed of by way of affidavit and oral evidence; matter set for hearing.

Orders

  • The application dated 30th October 2009 shall be disposed of by way of affidavit and oral evidence.
  • The matter shall be given a date for hearing at the registry on a priority basis.