[2007] KECA 303 (KLR)

[2007] KECA 303 (KLR)

The Court found that the respondent had failed to file the record of appeal for about nine years after lodging the notice of appeal, and there was no appearance or explanation for the delay. The Court held that such inordinate and unexplained delay is sufficient ground to strike out the notice of appeal. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KECA 303 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Grace Wakonyo Thiongo; Respondent: Gitau Tiria
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 55 of 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed. Notice of appeal struck out. Costs to the applicant.
Judges
J Wakiaga
Legal Topics
Appeals Process, Notice of Appeal, Striking Out Proceedings
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeals Process Notice of Appeal Striking Out Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Grace Wakonyo Thiongo

Applicant

Gitau Tiria

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the notice of appeal should be struck out due to failure to file the record of appeal within the prescribed time period.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the respondent had failed to file the record of appeal for about nine years after lodging the notice of appeal, and there was no appearance or explanation for the delay. The Court held that such inordinate and unexplained delay is sufficient ground to strike out the notice of appeal. The application to strike out the notice of appeal was therefore allowed, and costs were awarded to the applicant.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Notice of appeal struck out. Costs to the applicant.

Orders

  • The notice of appeal lodged on 30th November, 1998 is struck out.
  • The costs of this application shall be paid by the respondent to the applicant.