[2015] KEHC 3722 (KLR)
The court found that the Respondents fraudulently obtained a second Grant of Letters of Administration in Kiambu Succession Cause No. 268 of 1995 by failing to disclose the existence of an earlier grant in High Court Succession Cause No. 957 of 1988, which was still pending. The law does not permit two concurrent...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 3722 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Grace Wanjiku Kamau; Respondent: Wangui Gitau; Respondent: Paul Karanja Gitau
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 1652 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
- Outcome
- application allowed; grant and certificate of confirmation revoked; administrators substituted; title deed cancelled
- Judges
- LA Achode
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Grant, Fraudulent Concealment, Administration of Estates, Res Judicata, Confirmation of Grant
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Grace Wanjiku Kamau
Applicant
Wangui Gitau
Respondent
Paul Karanja Gitau
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Grant of Letters of Administration issued in Kiambu Succession Cause No. 268 of 1995 should be revoked due to fraudulent concealment of material facts.
- 2 Whether two concurrent Grants of Letters of Administration can exist for the same deceased's estate.
- 3 Whether the Respondents' actions deprived the estate of James Kamau Njuguna of its rightful share.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Respondents fraudulently obtained a second Grant of Letters of Administration in Kiambu Succession Cause No. 268 of 1995 by failing to disclose the existence of an earlier grant in High Court Succession Cause No. 957 of 1988, which was still pending. The law does not permit two concurrent grants for the same estate; the first grant in time remains valid and any subsequent grant is void and subject to revocation. The Respondents' actions deprived the estate of James Kamau Njuguna of its rightful share in the only asset, L.R. No. Githunguri/Kiairia/757. The court held that the proper procedure would have been for the 1st Respondent to seek substitution as...
Court Disposition
application allowed; grant and certificate of confirmation revoked; administrators substituted; title deed cancelled
Orders
- The Grant of Letters of Administration issued on 20th July 1995, and the Certificate of Confirmation issued on 13th March 1996 in Succession Cause No. 268 of 1995, in the Principal Magistrate’s Court – Kiambu is hereby revoked.
- The Applicant and the 1st Respondent are hereby substituted as Administrators in place of their husbands, James Kamau Njuguna and Gitau Gathuru (both Deceased) respectively, in High Court Succession No. 957 of 1988, to enable them prosecute the Summons for Confirmation of Grant dated 31st August 1995.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 1652 OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GATHURU CHUTHA (DECEASED)
GRACE WANJIKU KAMAU …………..……………………………. APPLICANT
V E R S U S
WANGUI GITAU ………..………………………………………1ST RESPONDENT
PAUL KARANJA GITAU …….......……………………………. 2ND RESPONDENT
RULING
In the Summons dated 18th July 2012 Grace Wanjiku Kamau, the Applicant herein, seeks that the Grant of Letters of Administration intestate issued on the 20th July 1995 and confirmed on the 13th March 1996 to the Respondents in Kiambu Succession Cause No. 268 of 1995 be revoked.
The Summons is predicated on grounds that the Grant and Certificate of Confirmation of Grant were obtained fraudulently by the making of a false statement, or concealment from the court of material facts. Further, that another Grant of Letters of Administration intestate had been issued by this Court on the 23rd November 1989 in Succession Cause No. 957 of 1988 concerning the estate of the same deceased person.
The application is supported by the affidavit of the Applicant of even date. In the affidavit she deponed that she is the widow of the late James Kamau Njuguna who died on the 2nd May 2000. That her late husband and his brother Gitau Gathuru also petitioned for a Grant of Letters of Administration Intestate, in respect of their father Gathuru Chutha who died on 18th August 1980 in High Court Succession Cause No. 957 of 1988.
The two petitioners were issued with a Grant of Letters of Administration on 23rd November 1989. Later in 1995 the petitioners applied for Confirmation of Grant by a Chamber Summons application dated 31st August 1995 supported by the affidavit of James Kamau Njuguna (Deceased).
The applicant deponed that the Estate had only one asset being L.R. NO. GITHUNGURI/KIAIRIA/757 measuring 5. 7 acres, which was to be shared amongst the two Administrators with Gitau Gathuru getting 3. 7 acres and James Kamau Njuguna getting 2 acres respectively.
The Applicant avers that on 11th May 1995, the 1st and 2nd Respondents petitioned for a Grant of Letters of Administration Intestate in Kiambu Succession Cause No. 268 of 1995, without disclosing the existence of Succession Cause No. 957 of 1988, which was still pending. The Grant of Letters of Administration in Succession Cause No. 268 of 1995 was issued to the Respondents on 20th July 1995 and confirmed on 13th March 1996.
In the application for confirmation the 1st Respondent gave to herself the whole of L.R. NO. GITHUNGURI/KIAIRIA/757, instead of taking 3. 7 acres which was the entitlement of her late husband and giving the remaining 2 acres to the Estate of James Kamau Njuguna. It is the Applicant’s assertion that the Respondents were aware of the existence of High Court (NBI) Succession Cause No. 957of 1988, but deliberately and fraudulently concealed this fact from the Court dealing with Kiambu Succession Cause No. 268 of 1995, with the main aim of depriving the estate of the late James Kamau Njuguna, of the two (2) acres it was entitled to in L.R. No. Githunguri/Kiairia/757.
When the summons dated 18th July 2012 came up for hearing on 9th March 2015, the Respondents did not attend court. An affidavit of service sworn on 6th March 2015, confirmed that notice of the hearing had been served on the two Respondents. The court directed that the summons be disposed of by way of written submissions and the Applicant to serve the Respondent with both the written submissions and notice of the mention date. The Applicant filed her submissions on 7th April 2015 and duly served the Respondents as evinced by the affidavit of service dated 2nd May 2015. The Respondents did not file their submissions or appear on the mention date.
In the written submissions Mr. Mwaura Shairi, counsel for the Applicant, stated that Succession Cause No. 268 of 1995 filed in the Kiambu court should not in law have been filed, since this court had in Succession Cause No. 957 of 1988, issued a Grant of Letters of Administration on 23rd November 1989. Mr. Mwaura asserted that after the death of Gitau Gathuru who was the husband to 1st Respondent, she should have applied to be substituted as administrator in Succession Cause No. 957 of 1988, instead of petitioning afresh for another Grant of Letters of Administration.
Mr. Mwaura also submitted that by the time the 1st Respondent obtained the Grant of Letters of Administration on 20th July 1995 and Certificate of Confirmation on 13th March 1996, the Applicant’s husband James Kamau Njuguna was still the Administrator of the Estate of Gathuru Chutha in High Court Succession Cause No. 957 of 1988. Mr. Mwaura relied on the doctrine of “Res Judicata and referred this court to High Court (Meru) Succession Cause No. 19 of 2000. In the matter of the Estate of CEASERY MUNITHU NDAMBA (Deceased), where this issued had been canvassed.
It is trite law that there cannot be in law two Grants of Letters of Administration, concerning the Estate of the same Deceased person. In such circumstances the first Grant in time remains and the second one is revoked. The Respondent was aware that her late husband Gitau Gathuru and the Applicant’s husband James Kamau Njuguna were joint administrators of the Estate of Gathuru Chutha (Deceased) and that James Kamau Njuguna was a beneficiary entitled to two (2) acres out of L.R. No. Githunguri/Kiairia/757. Her action of filing a separate petition for a Grant of Letters of Administration was fraudulent and had the effect of depriving James Kamau Njuguna of his share in L.R. No. Githunguri/Kiairia/757.
In the circumstances this application has merit and the court orders as follows:-
The Grant of Letters of Administration issued on 20th July 1995, and the Certificate of Confirmation issued on 13th March 1996 in Succession Cause No. 268 of 1995, in the Principal Magistrate’s Court – Kiambu is hereby revoked.
The Applicant and the 1st Respondent are hereby substituted as Administrators in place of their husbands, James Kamau Njuguna and Gitau Gathuru (both Deceased) respectively, in High Court Succession No. 957 of 1988, to enable them prosecute the Summons for Confirmation of Grant dated 31st August 1995.
The Land Registrar for Kiambu County is hereby directed to cancel the Title Deed issued to WANGUI GITAU in the Register in respect of L.R. No. GITHUNGURI/KIAIRIA/757.
It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 13th DAY OF July 2015.
L. ACHODE
JUDGE