[2021] KEELC 2351 (KLR)
The court found that the defendant's application dated 20th January 2020 sought reliefs that had already been determined in previous applications between the same parties, specifically those dated 26th September 2019 and 10th December 2019. The court reviewed the record and confirmed that the issues raised were...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEELC 2351 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Green Belt Ware House Limited; Defendant: Abdullahi Mohamed Sheikh
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 290 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection to Stay Application
- Outcome
- preliminary objection upheld; defendant's application dismissed with costs to plaintiff
- Judges
- LC Komingoi
- Legal Topics
- Res Judicata, Abuse of Court Process, Stay of Execution, Preliminary Objection
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Green Belt Ware House Limited
Plaintiff
Abdullahi Mohamed Sheikh
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection to Stay Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant's application is res judicata.
- 2 Whether the application constitutes an abuse of the court process.
- 3 Whether the preliminary objection should be upheld.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the defendant's application dated 20th January 2020 sought reliefs that had already been determined in previous applications between the same parties, specifically those dated 26th September 2019 and 10th December 2019. The court reviewed the record and confirmed that the issues raised were directly and substantially the same as those previously adjudicated, and thus the doctrine of res judicata applied. The repeated filing of similar applications was deemed an abuse of the court process. Consequently, the preliminary objection raised by the plaintiff was upheld, and the defendant's application was dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.
Court Disposition
preliminary objection upheld; defendant's application dismissed with costs to plaintiff
Orders
- The preliminary objection is upheld.
- The Notice of Motion dated 20th January 2020 is dismissed with costs to the plaintiff/respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
38 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT NAIROBI
ELC CASE NO. 290 OF 2019
GREEN BELT WARE HOUSE LIMITED......................................................PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT
-VERSUS-
ABDULLAHI MOHAMED SHEIKH...............................................................DEFENDANT/APPLICANT
RULING
1. The Defendant herein filed a Notice of Motion dated 20th January 2020 seeking a stay of execution of the Ruling and the orders of this court issued on 11th December 2019.
2. In response the plaintiff filed a notice of Preliminary of Objection dated 10th June 2020 the grounds are:-
1. The application res judicata for reasons that it seeks similar reliefs which have already been handled by the Honourable court vide Defendant’s applications dated 26th September, 2019 and 10th December 2019 respectively.
2. The Application is fatally and incurably defective for failure to attach the decision sought to be stayed.
3. In any case, the application is bad in law, vexatious an abuse of the court process.
3. On the 20th July 2020, the court with the consent of the parties directed that the preliminary objection be heard first in priority to the Notice of Motion dated 20th January 2020. The Court also directed that the Preliminary Objection be canvassed by way of written submissions. Parties were given fourteen (14) days to file the said submissions.
The Plaintiff’s Submissions
4. They are dated 16th September 2020. The Preliminary Objection is based on a pure point of law in which the court ought to sustain and dismiss the application. It has put forward the cases of Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd vs West End Distributors Ltd [1969] EA 696: IEBC vs Jane Cheperenger & 2 Others [2015] eKLR.
5. The application is res judicata as the prayers sought in the application were dismissed with costs in similar applications dated 26th September 2019 and 10th December 2019. It has also relied on Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act and the case of Ukay Estate Ltd & Another vs Shah Hirji Manek Ltd & 2 Others [2006] eKLR.
6. The issues being canvassed in the present application are the same matters that were directly and subsequently in issue in the previous applications. It has put forward the cases of James Kariuki Nganga t/a Ndungu Merchants vs Josephat Ngae Njuguna & Another [2004] eKLR; Orion East Africa Ltd vs Eco Bank Kenya Ltd & Another [2015] eKLR.
It prays that the application be dismissed
7. It appears the defendant neglected to file any written submissions. By the time of writing this ruling the defendant’s submissions were not on record.
8. I have considered the preliminary objection herein, the written submissions filed on behalf of the plaintiff and the authorities cited. The issue for determination is whether the preliminary objection is merited.
9. Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act provides.
“No court shall try any suit or issue in which the matter directly and substantially in issue has been directly and substantially in issue in a former suit between the same parties, or between parties under whom they or any of them claim, litigating under the same title, in a court competent to try such subsequent suit or the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised, and has been heard and finally decided by such court”.
10. I have gone through the court record. The Defendant’s Notice of Motion dated 26th September 2019 sought the following orders:-
1. That the application be certified as urgent.
2. That this honourable court do stay the proceedings before this honourable court pending the hearing and determination of High Court Commercial & Tax Division Civil Suit No. 501 of 2016 – Abdullahi Mohammed Sheikh vs Gulf African Bank Limited.
3. That this suit be consolidated with High Court Commercial & Tax Division Civil Suit No 501 of 2016- Abdullahi Mohammed Sheik vs Gulf African Bank Limited.
4. That costs of this application be provided for.
11. This court after considering the Notice of Motion dated 26th September 2019 delivered its ruling on 11th November 2019. The said Notice of Motion was dismissed for lack of merit. Thereafter the defendant filed a Notice of Motion dated 10th December 2019 which was slated for directions on 20th January 2020. On the 20th January 2020 the parties did not appear. Instead the defendant filed yet, the Notice of Motion dated 20th January 2020 seeking similar orders as in the previous applications. I agree with the plaintiff’s submissions that this applications is res judicata. It is an abuse of the court process. I find the preliminary objection herein merited and the same is upheld. The Notice of Motion dated 20th January 2020 is hereby dismissed with costs to the plaintiff/respondent.
It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN NAIROBI ON THIS 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
..........................
L. KOMINGOI
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
Mr. Ongeri for the Plaintiff
Ms Nganyi for Mr. B Khaemba for the Defendant.
Phyllis - Court Assistant