[2017] KEELC 1144 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 1144 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff was not afforded an opportunity to be heard before the suit was dismissed, as no notice to show cause was served. The plaintiff had died prior to the dismissal, and the legal representatives had since obtained a limited grant of letters of administration. The court held that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 1144 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Gregory Kimani Thuita; Defendant: The Administrators of the Estate of David Muriuki Kaberere; Defendant: Susan Wanjiru Kaberere; Defendant: The City Council of Nairobi
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 25 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and for Substitution of Plaintiff
Outcome
Applications granted with conditions.
Judges
AK Bor
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Dismissal, Substitution of Parties, Revival of Suit, Notice to Show Cause, Survival of Cause of Action
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Setting Aside Dismissal Substitution of Parties Revival of Suit Notice to Show Cause Survival of Cause of Action

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gregory Kimani Thuita

Plaintiff

The Administrators of the Estate of David Muriuki Kaberere

Defendant

Susan Wanjiru Kaberere

Defendant

The City Council of Nairobi

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and for Substitution of Plaintiff

  1. 1 Whether the order dismissing the suit should be set aside for lack of notice to the plaintiff.
  2. 2 Whether the suit should be reinstated and the plaintiff substituted by the legal representative of the estate.
  3. 3 Whether sufficient cause was shown for failure to attend court before dismissal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff was not afforded an opportunity to be heard before the suit was dismissed, as no notice to show cause was served. The plaintiff had died prior to the dismissal, and the legal representatives had since obtained a limited grant of letters of administration. The court held that sufficient cause was shown for the failure to attend court and that the cause of action survived the deceased plaintiff. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion under Order 12 Rule 7 and Order 24 Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules to set aside the dismissal, revive the suit, and allow substitution of the plaintiff by the legal representatives, subject to the condition that...

Court Disposition

Applications granted with conditions.

Orders

  • The applications dated 11/11/2016 and 8/6/2017 are granted.
  • The suit is reinstated and the legal representatives substituted as plaintiffs.