[2021] KEHC 7461 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 7461 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's application to set aside the ex-parte judgment was dismissed for non-attendance and not on its merits. The court held that the applicant deserves to be heard and that their application should be determined on merit. Consequently, the court allowed the application for stay of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 7461 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: The Guardian Coach; Applicant: Henry Macharia; Respondent: Phaustine Ongachi Ojijo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 6 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Hearing of Application to Set Aside Dismissal Order
Outcome
application allowed with conditions
Judges
AN Ongeri
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Ex Parte Judgment, Setting Aside Orders, Dismissal for Non Attendance
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Ex Parte Judgment Setting Aside Orders Dismissal for Non Attendance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Guardian Coach

Applicant

Henry Macharia

Applicant

Phaustine Ongachi Ojijo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Hearing of Application to Set Aside Dismissal Order

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of the application to set aside the dismissal order.
  2. 2 Whether the application to set aside the ex-parte judgment should be heard on its merits.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's application to set aside the ex-parte judgment was dismissed for non-attendance and not on its merits. The court held that the applicant deserves to be heard and that their application should be determined on merit. Consequently, the court allowed the application for stay of execution on condition that the applicant pays the costs of the application and the auctioneer's costs before the release of the attached motor vehicle. The court emphasized the importance of affording parties an opportunity to be heard and ensuring that justice is served by determining matters on their merits rather than on technicalities or procedural lapses.

Court Disposition

application allowed with conditions

Orders

  • The application dated 13/1/2021 is allowed on condition that the applicant pays the costs of the application to be agreed upon by the parties or assessed by the Deputy Registrar.
  • The attachment is lifted and the orders for stay of execution are extended pending the hearing and determination of the application dated 6/1/2021.