[2025] KEHC 3530 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 3530 (KLR)

The court found that the issue of arbitral costs was not settled by the parties' mediation or deeds of variation, as previously determined in Miscellaneous Civil Application No. E327 of 2024. The arbitral tribunal's Award One, dated 25th January, 2024, which determined the costs issue, was challenged and upheld by...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 3530 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Qian Guojun; Respondent: Guo Huadong
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E326 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Arbitral Award
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
CJ Kendagor
Legal Topics
Arbitral Award Enforcement, Costs of Arbitration, Recognition of Awards
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Alternative Dispute Resolution Arbitral Award Enforcement Costs of Arbitration Recognition of Awards

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Qian Guojun

Applicant

Guo Huadong

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Arbitral Award

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal's Award One dated 25th January, 2024 should be recognized and enforced as a judgment of the court.
  2. 2 Whether the issue of arbitral costs was settled by the parties' mediation and deeds of variation.
  3. 3 Whether there is any legal basis to deny adoption of the arbitral award given prior High Court determinations.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the issue of arbitral costs was not settled by the parties' mediation or deeds of variation, as previously determined in Miscellaneous Civil Application No. E327 of 2024. The arbitral tribunal's Award One, dated 25th January, 2024, which determined the costs issue, was challenged and upheld by the High Court in the same prior proceedings. There being no valid ground to refuse recognition or enforcement, and the award having been confirmed as valid and binding, the court allowed the application to recognize and adopt the arbitral award as a decree of the court. The court made no order as to costs for the present application.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The Tribunal’s Award One, dated 25th January, 2024 is recognized and adopted as a decree of this Court.
  • No order as to costs.