Gure t/a Haskul Constractors Ltd v Kirunge t/a Wambu Hardware Maralal (Civil Appeal E008 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 11005 (KLR) (15 July 2026) (Ruling)

Gure t/a Haskul Constractors Ltd v Kirunge t/a Wambu Hardware Maralal (Civil Appeal E008 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 11005 (KLR) (15 July 2026) (Ruling)

The court declined to entertain the application because it would not sit as an appellate court over a decision of a judge of similar jurisdiction. Following that indication, the applicant filed a notice of withdrawal of the appeal, which the court allowed, resulting in closure of the file.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 11005 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant/appellant: Hassan Gure T/A Haskul Contractors Ltd; Respondent/respondent: James Mburu Kirunge T/A Wambu Hardware Maralal
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E008 of 2026
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to Come on Record, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay, and Subsequent Withdrawal of Appeal
Outcome
Application overtaken by withdrawal of the appeal; appeal withdrawn and file closed.
Judges
["LN Mutende"]
Legal Topics
Leave to Come on Record, Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Execution, Jurisdiction of Appellate Court, Withdrawal of Appeal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appellate Practice Leave to Come on Record Appeal Out of Time Stay of Execution Jurisdiction of Appellate Court Withdrawal of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hassan Gure T/A Haskul Contractors Ltd

Applicant/appellant

James Mburu Kirunge T/A Wambu Hardware Maralal

Respondent/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to Come on Record, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay, and Subsequent Withdrawal of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the court could grant leave to come on record for the applicant's advocates
  2. 2 Whether leave should be granted to file an appeal out of time
  3. 3 Whether stay of execution should issue

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to entertain the application because it would not sit as an appellate court over a decision of a judge of similar jurisdiction. Following that indication, the applicant filed a notice of withdrawal of the appeal, which the court allowed, resulting in closure of the file.

Court Disposition

Application overtaken by withdrawal of the appeal; appeal withdrawn and file closed.

Orders

  • Notice of withdrawal of the appeal dated 10/7/2026 allowed.
  • File closed.