[2005] KEHC 2475 (KLR)

[2005] KEHC 2475 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant failed to take any steps to prosecute the appeal after filing and serving the Memorandum of Appeal. No record of appeal was filed, and no explanation was provided for the delay. More than a year had passed since service of the Memorandum of Appeal, and the requirements of Order 41...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] KEHC 2475 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Gusii Farmers Rural Sacco Ltd; Respondent: Henry Mageto Kerina; Respondent: Petro Mosoti; Respondent: Augostino Nyakundi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisii
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 91 of 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
appeal dismissed for want of prosecution
Judges
K Bauni
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Appeal Procedure, Failure to Prosecute
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Appeal Procedure Failure to Prosecute

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gusii Farmers Rural Sacco Ltd

Appellant

Henry Mageto Kerina

Respondent

Petro Mosoti

Respondent

Augostino Nyakundi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution under Order 41 rule 31 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant failed to take any steps to prosecute the appeal after filing and serving the Memorandum of Appeal. No record of appeal was filed, and no explanation was provided for the delay. More than a year had passed since service of the Memorandum of Appeal, and the requirements of Order 41 rule 31(2) Civil Procedure Rules were satisfied. The application for dismissal was unopposed, and the court concluded that this was a proper case for dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed for want of prosecution

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs.
  • Appellant granted leave to appeal.