[2017] KEELC 3135 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 3135 (KLR)

The court found no sufficient reason to interfere with or review the previous orders issued by Justice Mutungi, which directed that the suit property remain in vacant possession pending the hearing and determination of the suit. The court emphasized that issuing further interlocutory orders as sought by the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 3135 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Guy Spencer Elms (suing as the personal representative of the Estate of Roger Bryan Robson (Deceased)); Defendant: Agnes Kariuki Kagure
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 80 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Review of Orders
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
MM Gitumbi
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Orders, Vacant Possession, Review of Orders, Pre Trial Procedure
Source Language
en
Land and Property Interlocutory Orders Vacant Possession Review of Orders Pre Trial Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Guy Spencer Elms (suing as the personal representative of the Estate of Roger Bryan Robson (Deceased))

Plaintiff

Agnes Kariuki Kagure

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Review of Orders

  1. 1 Whether the defendant is entitled to a review of Justice Mutungi's orders issued on 9/7/2015.
  2. 2 Whether interlocutory orders sought by the defendant/applicant should be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found no sufficient reason to interfere with or review the previous orders issued by Justice Mutungi, which directed that the suit property remain in vacant possession pending the hearing and determination of the suit. The court emphasized that issuing further interlocutory orders as sought by the defendant/applicant would serve no useful purpose and could prejudice the fair determination of the main issue of ownership. The court endorsed the prior order and directed that the matter proceed to pre-trial conference to facilitate a full hearing and final resolution of the dispute.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • Notice of Motion dated 9/7/2015 is dismissed.
  • Costs in the cause.