[2015] KEHC 3875 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 3875 (KLR)

The court found that the petitioner had established the grounds of desertion, cruelty, and adultery as required under Section 66 of the Marriage Act 2014. The evidence, including unchallenged testimony and a medical report, demonstrated that the respondent deserted the matrimonial home for over five years, was cruel...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 3875 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: H R C; Respondent: R M W
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Divorce Cause 74 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Outcome
petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Judges
REA Ougo
Legal Topics
Divorce, Custody of Children, Matrimonial Cruelty, Adultery, Desertion
Source Language
en
Family and Children Divorce Custody of Children Matrimonial Cruelty Adultery Desertion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

H R C

Petitioner

R M W

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Divorce Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondent deserted the matrimonial home for a continuous period of at least five years preceding the petition.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent was guilty of cruelty towards the petitioner and the children of the marriage.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent committed adultery during the subsistence of the marriage.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the petitioner had established the grounds of desertion, cruelty, and adultery as required under Section 66 of the Marriage Act 2014. The evidence, including unchallenged testimony and a medical report, demonstrated that the respondent deserted the matrimonial home for over five years, was cruel to the petitioner and the children, and was living with another woman with whom he had children. The respondent's failure to appear or contest the petition further supported the petitioner's case. The court concluded that the marriage had irretrievably broken down and there was no possibility of reconciliation. Accordingly, the marriage was dissolved and a decree nisi was...

Court Disposition

petition allowed; marriage dissolved

Orders

  • The marriage between the petitioner and respondent celebrated on 3rd April 2003 is dissolved.
  • A decree nisi to issue forthwith and to be made absolute within 30 days.