[2018] KEHC 7830 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 7830 (KLR)

The court found that the reasons advanced by the applicant for the delay, specifically the technological hitch regarding the non-receipt of an instructing email, were sufficient to justify the extension of time to file an appeal. The court exercised its discretion to allow the application for leave to appeal out of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 7830 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: Hadija Mohammed; Applicant: Peter Mungai Chege
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 21 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed in part
Judges
A Ali-Aroni
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Extension of Time, Decree Execution
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Leave to Appeal Out of Time Extension of Time Decree Execution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hadija Mohammed

Respondent

Peter Mungai Chege

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient cause for extension of time to file an appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether a stay of execution of the decree should be granted pending the intended appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the reasons advanced by the applicant for the delay, specifically the technological hitch regarding the non-receipt of an instructing email, were sufficient to justify the extension of time to file an appeal. The court exercised its discretion to allow the application for leave to appeal out of time, subject to the condition that the entire decretal amount be deposited in court within 14 days. The court thereby balanced the interests of both parties by ensuring the respondent's interests were secured through the deposit, while not shutting out the applicant from the appellate process due to a procedural lapse attributed to a technological issue.

Court Disposition

application allowed in part

Orders

  • Leave to appeal out of time is granted; the appeal must be filed within 14 days.
  • A stay of execution is granted subject to the entire decretal amount being deposited in court within 14 days.